Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1271 - 1280 of 15294 for probate.
Search results 1271 - 1280 of 15294 for probate.
CA Blank Order
to challenge the sentences imposed following revocation of his probation. Wilber was advised of his right
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142724 - 2015-06-01
to challenge the sentences imposed following revocation of his probation. Wilber was advised of his right
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142724 - 2015-06-01
[PDF]
James A. Mentek, Jr. v. Gerald Berge
of procedural errors and delays in the proceeding to revoke his probation. Mentek contends on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13844 - 2014-09-15
of procedural errors and delays in the proceeding to revoke his probation. Mentek contends on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13844 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI App 48
of probation. At the father’s sentencing, the circuit court appeared to assign greater culpability to Weigel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=549045 - 2022-09-14
of probation. At the father’s sentencing, the circuit court appeared to assign greater culpability to Weigel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=549045 - 2022-09-14
James A. Mentek, Jr. v. Gerald Berge
from custody because of procedural errors and delays in the proceeding to revoke his probation. Mentek
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13844 - 2005-03-31
from custody because of procedural errors and delays in the proceeding to revoke his probation. Mentek
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13844 - 2005-03-31
State v. Herbert H. Timmerman
was imposed as a condition of probation under §§ 973.09 and 303.08, Stats. Another portion of the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8417 - 2005-03-31
was imposed as a condition of probation under §§ 973.09 and 303.08, Stats. Another portion of the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8417 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Herbert H. Timmerman
during his sixty-day confinement in the county jail, which was imposed as a condition of probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8417 - 2017-09-19
during his sixty-day confinement in the county jail, which was imposed as a condition of probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8417 - 2017-09-19
State v. Robert F. Karl
. The court imposed and stayed a prison sentence of twenty years, and placed Karl on probation for twenty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12279 - 2005-03-31
. The court imposed and stayed a prison sentence of twenty years, and placed Karl on probation for twenty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12279 - 2005-03-31
State v. Shawn D. Knapp
because I'm going to put you on probation while you're in prison; and so your behavior there is going
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7752 - 2005-03-31
because I'm going to put you on probation while you're in prison; and so your behavior there is going
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7752 - 2005-03-31
State v. Shawn D. Knapp
because I'm going to put you on probation while you're in prison; and so your behavior there is going
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7754 - 2005-03-31
because I'm going to put you on probation while you're in prison; and so your behavior there is going
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7754 - 2005-03-31
Harold E. Taves v. Michael T. Sullivan
to revoke his probation. The Department carried out the revocation more than eighteen months earlier, after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12968 - 2005-03-31
to revoke his probation. The Department carried out the revocation more than eighteen months earlier, after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12968 - 2005-03-31