Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1271 - 1280 of 6397 for wide.

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 8, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of...
of counsel that are “outside the wide range of professionally competent assistance.” Id. at 690. To prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28353 - 2007-03-07

[PDF] NOTICE
exercise of the trial court’s discretion. We disagree. ¶5 A trial court is permitted wide discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34497 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Roger Walker v. Dennis Schrimpf
a depression about twelve inches wide, six to eight inches long and eight to ten inches deep, described
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12600 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
blocks, on a wide street with no line marking the No. 2015AP1010 3 parking lane
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159431 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Harold J. Sheehy v. Franz M. Kraler, M.D.
, 1989, Sheehy underwent a surgical procedure described as including a “wide excision of the left
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14111 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
point to specific acts or omissions by his lawyer that are “outside the wide range of professionally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=128516 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
assistance encompasses a “wide range” of behaviors and “[a] fair assessment of attorney performance requires
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41403 - 2009-09-29

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 21, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
., ¶15, the information that the police were able to confirm was widely available, and the informant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28500 - 2007-03-20

State v. William Ray Toles
approach was unreasonable or outside the wide range of professional norms, or that a claim of ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6843 - 2005-03-31

State v. John L. Kuslits
within the wide discretion of the sentencing judge.” State v. Stenzel, No. 03-2974-CR, slip op. at ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6859 - 2005-03-31