Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12701 - 12710 of 17654 for ex.

[PDF] Mollie Place v. City of Milwaukee
in response to a dispatch indicating that a man had a gun and was threatening his ex-girlfriend and her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7177 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Edward Parker
constitute ineffective assistance is a mixed question of law and fact. State ex rel. Flores v. State, 183
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11074 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Frontsheet
, 260 Wis. 2d 633, 660 N.W.2d 656 (cited with approval in State ex rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court, 2004
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214794 - 2018-08-28

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. See State ex rel. Wren v. Richardson, 2019 WI 110, ¶25, 389 Wis. 2d 516, 936 N.W.2d 587; Industrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=961683 - 2025-05-28

[PDF] CA Blank Order
surcharges went into effect before Rabell’s offenses so there is no ex post facto concern, Rabell
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175441 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Amado Saldana, Jr.
. For this reason, and because Saldana appears pro se, we chose to address the merits. See State ex rel. Harris v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2893 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Toni Nicoletti v. Teachers Retirement Board
of statutory eligibility requirements is entitled to “great weight” deference. See State ex. rel Bliss v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3482 - 2017-09-20

Janell R. S. v. J.R. S.
rights with his son, Jake. His ex-wife, Janell moved to terminate J.R.’s physical placement rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11715 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, to avoid absurd or unreasonable results.” See State ex rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane Cnty., 2004
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=377016 - 2021-06-16

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
); State v. Jones, No. 2007AP2097-CR, unpublished slip op. (WI App Sept. 23, 2008); State ex rel. Jones v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89014 - 2014-09-15