Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12711 - 12720 of 30012 for consulta de causas.

CA Blank Order
review de novo whether facts constitute a new factor. State v. Boyden, 2012 WI App 38, ¶6, 340 Wis. 2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131916 - 2014-12-15

COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. Chenequa Land Conservancy, Inc. v. Village of Hartland, 2004 WI App 144, ¶12, 275 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108400 - 2014-02-24

[PDF] Cincinnati Insurance Company v. Torke Coffee Roasting Company
. ¶6 We review a trial court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, owing no deference to the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5072 - 2017-09-19

State v. Daniel J. Bohringer
application to a set of facts is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Sutton, 177 Wis. 2d 709
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5832 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Fond du Lac County v. Elizabeth M.P.
. This issue presents a question of statutory construction, which we review de novo. See GTE North, Inc. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12270 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Frank Machado
amounted to ineffective assistance is a question of law which we review de novo." Id. (citation omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7858 - 2017-09-19

State v. Anthony D. Johnson
to the effective assistance of counsel is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5433 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
of facts constitutes a new factor is a question of law that this court decides de novo. State v. Lechner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33828 - 2008-08-25

State v. Daniel J. Kueht
constitutional and statutory standards is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Krier, 165 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5152 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
erroneous, and we review de novo the application of those facts to the constitutional standard. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38611 - 2009-07-29