Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12711 - 12720 of 30117 for de.
Search results 12711 - 12720 of 30117 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standard as the circuit court. Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=985829 - 2025-07-23
review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standard as the circuit court. Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=985829 - 2025-07-23
COURT OF APPEALS
the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo. Id. ¶7 In support of its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88301 - 2012-10-16
the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo. Id. ¶7 In support of its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88301 - 2012-10-16
COURT OF APPEALS
of the property ultimately is a question of law that we review de novo. Mentzel v. City of Oshkosh, 146 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78777 - 2012-02-28
of the property ultimately is a question of law that we review de novo. Mentzel v. City of Oshkosh, 146 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78777 - 2012-02-28
State v. Michael P. Fitzpatrick
constitution and of a state statute are questions of law this court decides de novo, benefiting from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17733 - 2005-04-13
constitution and of a state statute are questions of law this court decides de novo, benefiting from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17733 - 2005-04-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that we review de novo. Breitzman, 378 Wis. 2d 431, ¶¶37-39. We reject Jones’s claim because he has
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1085846 - 2026-03-04
that we review de novo. Breitzman, 378 Wis. 2d 431, ¶¶37-39. We reject Jones’s claim because he has
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1085846 - 2026-03-04
Heritage Mutual Insurance Company v. James Heike
.” Section 807.05, Stats. We examine whether a binding stipulation exists under a de novo standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13473 - 2005-03-31
.” Section 807.05, Stats. We examine whether a binding stipulation exists under a de novo standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13473 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Tillman, 2005 WI App 71, ¶14, 281 Wis. 2d 157, 696 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41868 - 2009-10-05
is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Tillman, 2005 WI App 71, ¶14, 281 Wis. 2d 157, 696 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41868 - 2009-10-05
State v. Gary L. Radloff
assistance is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. ¶8 We turn to the threshold question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7429 - 2005-03-31
assistance is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. ¶8 We turn to the threshold question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7429 - 2005-03-31
Andree Gentry v. Susan J. Wilson, M.D.
is de novo. Id. ¶9 The following facts are undisputed. The date of injury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2614 - 2005-03-31
is de novo. Id. ¶9 The following facts are undisputed. The date of injury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2614 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
without a hearing. Ibid. We review de novo whether a defendant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94401 - 2013-03-25
without a hearing. Ibid. We review de novo whether a defendant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94401 - 2013-03-25