Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12711 - 12720 of 50107 for our.

CA Blank Order
to file a response, but has not exercised his right to do so. Upon consideration of the report and our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117324 - 2014-07-22

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
of discretion. Based on our independent review of the record, we agree with counsel’s conclusion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98214 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] John P. Barnes v. Village of Lannon
with the comprehensive plan was arbitrary and lacked a rational basis. Our review of a certiorari action is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19036 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
incredible will we substitute our judgment for that of the factfinder.” Ibid. While Uptown accurately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71379 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
in this situation. Our supreme court has previously held, when reviewing a conviction for first-degree sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249701 - 2019-11-07

[PDF] CA Blank Order
postconviction motion for sentence credit. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177540 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
did not file a response. Based upon our independent review of the no-merit report and the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226871 - 2018-11-07

[PDF] CA Blank Order
it raises, and based on our independent review of the record, we agree with counsel’s assessment that none
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231620 - 2019-01-02

[PDF] CA Blank Order
denying postconviction relief. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166055 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
arguable merit. Our review of a sentencing determination begins with a “presumption that the [circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=286081 - 2020-09-10