Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12711 - 12720 of 58506 for speedy trial.

State v. Gary L. Everts
motion for postconviction relief. The trial court concluded that the 2004 reduction of his 2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18233 - 2005-05-24

[PDF] CA Blank Order
sexual assault of a child, D.T. On the scheduled trial date, D.T.’s mother and D.T. did not appear
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249521 - 2019-10-30

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
, Trisha Brown, was apprehended with him. She was the State’s principal witness at Davis’s trial. Brown
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=999093 - 2025-08-20

[PDF] State v. Gary L. Everts
denying in part and granting in part his motion for postconviction relief. The trial court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18233 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. James C. Koepp
) he received an improper sentence because of those mental health problems; and (3) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11833 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Michael T. Schmaling
for resentencing or, in the alternative, for a modification of his sentence. Schmaling insists that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8281 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
an No. 2014AP330-CR 2 order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. Farrell contends that trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130180 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Janice M. Eilola v. Linda Hattlestad
No. 99-0682-FT 2 of her father, Gerald Eilola.1 She argues that the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15254 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Anthony Keller v. Barbara Keller
that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it modified placement. She also contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4559 - 2017-09-20

State v. Mareese Anderson
an order denying his postconviction motion for sentence modification. Anderson argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11809 - 2005-03-31