Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12711 - 12720 of 73032 for we.
Search results 12711 - 12720 of 73032 for we.
State v. Mark Sevelin
" at the treatment center. See § 973.155(1)(a), Stats.[2] We conclude that (1) Sevelin can be convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10531 - 2005-03-31
" at the treatment center. See § 973.155(1)(a), Stats.[2] We conclude that (1) Sevelin can be convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10531 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a decision not supported by the facts, and was biased against her. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Patrina
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91486 - 2014-09-15
a decision not supported by the facts, and was biased against her. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Patrina
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91486 - 2014-09-15
Michael T. v. Norma Briggs
proceeding. While we believe requiring Dane County to pay the fees under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10789 - 2005-03-31
proceeding. While we believe requiring Dane County to pay the fees under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10789 - 2005-03-31
State v. Glenn Turner
),[1] and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. We affirm the judgment and order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7227 - 2005-03-31
),[1] and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. We affirm the judgment and order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7227 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
by a California medical doctor. We affirm the judgment as to the paraphernalia violation, but reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49183 - 2010-04-19
by a California medical doctor. We affirm the judgment as to the paraphernalia violation, but reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49183 - 2010-04-19
COURT OF APPEALS
in dismissing his motion to suppress based on lack of timeliness. We agree and hold that, contrary to the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30087 - 2007-08-27
in dismissing his motion to suppress based on lack of timeliness. We agree and hold that, contrary to the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30087 - 2007-08-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, we conclude at No. 2021AP175 2 conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=507076 - 2022-04-13
, we conclude at No. 2021AP175 2 conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=507076 - 2022-04-13
COURT OF APPEALS
the jury on the charge of obstruction. We agree with Peters that the evidence should have been suppressed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32802 - 2008-05-27
the jury on the charge of obstruction. We agree with Peters that the evidence should have been suppressed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32802 - 2008-05-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment as to two claims and dismissing one of their claims. We affirm the circuit court in all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210860 - 2018-04-11
judgment as to two claims and dismissing one of their claims. We affirm the circuit court in all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210860 - 2018-04-11
State v. William Speener
effective assistance of trial counsel and we see no reason to exercise our discretionary reversal powers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12022 - 2005-03-31
effective assistance of trial counsel and we see no reason to exercise our discretionary reversal powers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12022 - 2005-03-31