Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12721 - 12730 of 30012 for consulta de causas.
Search results 12721 - 12730 of 30012 for consulta de causas.
COURT OF APPEALS
to the following, which we review de novo: (1) whether the DOC kept within its jurisdiction; (2) whether the DOC
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79524 - 2012-03-14
to the following, which we review de novo: (1) whether the DOC kept within its jurisdiction; (2) whether the DOC
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79524 - 2012-03-14
COURT OF APPEALS
reexamination reports show probable cause presents a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Kruse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31305 - 2007-12-26
reexamination reports show probable cause presents a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Kruse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31305 - 2007-12-26
COURT OF APPEALS
of review, upholding the circuit court’s factual findings unless clearly erroneous but reviewing de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53317 - 2010-08-16
of review, upholding the circuit court’s factual findings unless clearly erroneous but reviewing de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53317 - 2010-08-16
State v. Joseph V. Hotynski
that this court resolves de novo. State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis.2d 349, 356, 525 N.W.2d 102, 104 (Ct. App. 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9827 - 2005-03-31
that this court resolves de novo. State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis.2d 349, 356, 525 N.W.2d 102, 104 (Ct. App. 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9827 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
, however, is reviewed de novo. Id. ¶6 Albrecht first contends that the out-of-court eyewitness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41629 - 2014-09-15
, however, is reviewed de novo. Id. ¶6 Albrecht first contends that the out-of-court eyewitness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41629 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Andrew D. Wielunski
that this court's review is de novo because a question of law is presented. The State argues that because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14795 - 2017-09-21
that this court's review is de novo because a question of law is presented. The State argues that because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14795 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Ronald L. Dantuma
—identity of issues and parties and actual litigation of the issue—our review is de novo. Ambrose v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15492 - 2017-09-21
—identity of issues and parties and actual litigation of the issue—our review is de novo. Ambrose v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15492 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Douglas E. Smith
). Whether a defendant does so is a question of law that we review de novo. See id., 201 Wis. 2d at 310
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4933 - 2017-09-19
). Whether a defendant does so is a question of law that we review de novo. See id., 201 Wis. 2d at 310
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4933 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of counsel is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id. DISCUSSION ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90571 - 2014-09-15
of counsel is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id. DISCUSSION ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90571 - 2014-09-15
Cincinnati Insurance Company v. Mayfair Property, Inc.
We review the trial court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15184 - 2005-03-31
We review the trial court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15184 - 2005-03-31