Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12721 - 12730 of 30117 for de.
Search results 12721 - 12730 of 30117 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS
was deficient and whether it prejudiced the defendant is reviewed de novo. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d at 128. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60101 - 2011-02-22
was deficient and whether it prejudiced the defendant is reviewed de novo. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d at 128. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60101 - 2011-02-22
Highland Manor Associates v. Michele Bast
which we determine de novo. State ex rel. Darby v. Litscher, 2002 WI App 258, ¶7, 258 Wis. 2d 270, 653
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5798 - 2005-03-31
which we determine de novo. State ex rel. Darby v. Litscher, 2002 WI App 258, ¶7, 258 Wis. 2d 270, 653
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5798 - 2005-03-31
Cincinnati Insurance Company v. Mayfair Property, Inc.
We review the trial court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15184 - 2005-03-31
We review the trial court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15184 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
an error is harmless is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Magett, 2014 WI 67, ¶29, 355
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=363245 - 2021-05-05
an error is harmless is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Magett, 2014 WI 67, ¶29, 355
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=363245 - 2021-05-05
Clyde Kreutter v. Midwest MedicalHomecare, Inc.
the facts to the applicable landlord/tenant statutes. This is a question of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8655 - 2005-03-31
the facts to the applicable landlord/tenant statutes. This is a question of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8655 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” WIS. STAT. § 802.08(2) (2011-12) 3 . We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131986 - 2017-09-21
“is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” WIS. STAT. § 802.08(2) (2011-12) 3 . We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131986 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. Application of a statute to a set of facts presents a question of law that we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35260 - 2009-01-20
. Application of a statute to a set of facts presents a question of law that we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35260 - 2009-01-20
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. State v. Sartin, 200 Wis. 2d 47, 53, 546 N.W.2d 449
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62889 - 2011-04-19
is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. State v. Sartin, 200 Wis. 2d 47, 53, 546 N.W.2d 449
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62889 - 2011-04-19
COURT OF APPEALS
that we review de novo. See State v. Tillman, 2005 WI App 71, ¶14, 281 Wis. 2d 157, 696 N.W.2d 574. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58004 - 2010-12-20
that we review de novo. See State v. Tillman, 2005 WI App 71, ¶14, 281 Wis. 2d 157, 696 N.W.2d 574. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58004 - 2010-12-20
Margaret Lamkin v. St. Croix County
and dismissed her complaint. Our review of summary judgment is de novo. We apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10088 - 2005-03-31
and dismissed her complaint. Our review of summary judgment is de novo. We apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10088 - 2005-03-31