Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12721 - 12730 of 18724 for quote.

[PDF] State v. Robert L. Albert
(1994) (quoted source omitted). “Bias” may be “inferred” from “the facts and circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4075 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Earl Steele III
or preventing intimidation of witnesses.” Id. at ¶33 (quoting WIS. STAT. § 969.01(4)). ¶21 Because bail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2174 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Paul J. Stuart
sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.” Id. (quoting Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3975 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Frank James Burt, Jr.
the possibility that even though innocent he may be found guilty.” Id. at 127-28 (quoting Green v. United
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15489 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Dunn County Department of Human Services v. LaMoine S.
by the legislature or by the plain language used." See id. at 350, 305 N.W.2d at 68 (quoting Lukaszewicz v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10997 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI 42
could have the house transferred to her own name. R.G. was quoted a $1,000 flat fee
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32708 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Lawson Bender v. Karmen Lindhal
is told later. Hulett, 6 Wis.2d at 26, 94 N.W.2d at 130 (quoted source omitted). In Hulett
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8397 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State of Wisconsin v. Gale D. Nelson
(quoting State v. Hampton, 2004 WI 107, ¶57, 274 Wis. 2d 379, 683 N.W.2d 14). Instead, the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25964 - 2017-09-21

State v. David Barton
.” People v. Thomas, 30 Cal. Rptr. 3d 582, 587 (Cal. Ct. App. 2005) (quoting Crawford, 541 U.S. at 59, n.9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20764 - 2006-01-24

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
.’” D.J.W., 391 Wis. 2d 231, ¶32 (quoting § 51.20(1)(am)). Two years ago in D.J.W., our supreme court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=590981 - 2022-11-17