Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12721 - 12730 of 64055 for records/1000.
Search results 12721 - 12730 of 64055 for records/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
is not part of the record on appeal, and we therefore assume it supports the trial court’s decision.[6] See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65083 - 2011-05-31
is not part of the record on appeal, and we therefore assume it supports the trial court’s decision.[6] See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65083 - 2011-05-31
Joan I. Schwarz v. Dane County
as to any material fact. Sauk County records reflect that [J.T.’s step-daughters] were adjudicated CHIPS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14547 - 2005-03-31
as to any material fact. Sauk County records reflect that [J.T.’s step-daughters] were adjudicated CHIPS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14547 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
is conclusory in nature, or if the record conclusively shows the appellant is not entitled to relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28567 - 2014-09-15
is conclusory in nature, or if the record conclusively shows the appellant is not entitled to relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28567 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
by the prosecutor prior to voir dire. The record indicates that a second amended information was filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29422 - 2014-09-15
by the prosecutor prior to voir dire. The record indicates that a second amended information was filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29422 - 2014-09-15
Frontsheet
] and SCR 20:1:15(f)(1)g.,[5] Attorney Stange failed to keep complete and accurate trust account records
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84159 - 2012-06-26
] and SCR 20:1:15(f)(1)g.,[5] Attorney Stange failed to keep complete and accurate trust account records
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84159 - 2012-06-26
[PDF]
State v. Winnebago County
platted or recorded. As the State characterizes them, they are lots “only in the developer's mind
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8338 - 2017-09-19
platted or recorded. As the State characterizes them, they are lots “only in the developer's mind
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8338 - 2017-09-19
State v. Winnebago County
, constituted an unnecessary hardship thus warranting a variance. After reviewing the record, the court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8338 - 2005-03-31
, constituted an unnecessary hardship thus warranting a variance. After reviewing the record, the court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8338 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
When police learned of the cell phone calls, they checked phone records and determined that the calls
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80090 - 2012-03-26
When police learned of the cell phone calls, they checked phone records and determined that the calls
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80090 - 2012-03-26
[PDF]
NOTICE
4 We are not limited to the record before the circuit court at the time of the suppression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57084 - 2014-09-15
4 We are not limited to the record before the circuit court at the time of the suppression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57084 - 2014-09-15
State v. James L. Wright
in the record to support the charge. We agree, reverse the judgment and order, and remand with directions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5981 - 2005-03-31
in the record to support the charge. We agree, reverse the judgment and order, and remand with directions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5981 - 2005-03-31