Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12721 - 12730 of 58546 for speedy trial.
Search results 12721 - 12730 of 58546 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Timothy J. Novak
of the trial court for the reasons discussed below. ¶2 Novak and his wife were charged with arson and three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3095 - 2017-09-20
of the trial court for the reasons discussed below. ¶2 Novak and his wife were charged with arson and three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3095 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. James C. Koepp
) he received an improper sentence because of those mental health problems; and (3) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11833 - 2017-09-21
) he received an improper sentence because of those mental health problems; and (3) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11833 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Michael T. Schmaling
for resentencing or, in the alternative, for a modification of his sentence. Schmaling insists that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8281 - 2017-09-19
for resentencing or, in the alternative, for a modification of his sentence. Schmaling insists that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8281 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Lynn G.
the jury’s finding that she failed to assume parental responsibility; and (2) the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6920 - 2017-09-20
the jury’s finding that she failed to assume parental responsibility; and (2) the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6920 - 2017-09-20
State v. Shulbert Z. Williams
the ineffective assistance of trial counsel. We affirm. I. BACKGROUND ¶2 Williams, his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2812 - 2005-03-31
the ineffective assistance of trial counsel. We affirm. I. BACKGROUND ¶2 Williams, his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2812 - 2005-03-31
Jacqueline M. Grosshans v. William J. Grosshans
consider extrinsic evidence. See Lambert, 135 Wis. 2d at 115 n.8. Grosshans complains that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25803 - 2006-07-05
consider extrinsic evidence. See Lambert, 135 Wis. 2d at 115 n.8. Grosshans complains that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25803 - 2006-07-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
trial counsel. We reject Paulson’s arguments and affirm the judgment and order. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89579 - 2014-09-15
trial counsel. We reject Paulson’s arguments and affirm the judgment and order. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89579 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Timothy B. Wilks
denying his postconviction motion. NO. 96-1258-CR 2 Wilks claims that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10770 - 2017-09-20
denying his postconviction motion. NO. 96-1258-CR 2 Wilks claims that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10770 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
an No. 2014AP330-CR 2 order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. Farrell contends that trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130180 - 2017-09-21
an No. 2014AP330-CR 2 order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. Farrell contends that trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130180 - 2017-09-21
Janice M. Eilola v. Linda Hattlestad
.[1] She argues that the trial court erroneously imposed the constructive trust for the benefit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15254 - 2005-03-31
.[1] She argues that the trial court erroneously imposed the constructive trust for the benefit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15254 - 2005-03-31