Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12731 - 12740 of 81919 for simple case.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
in reviewing the records at issue. Leiser argues that the trial court erred in dismissing his case because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81101 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Burley Harding
schedule. The case finally went to trial after eight or nine judges had presided over the case and had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14153 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Vincente Murillo, Jr.
. The court stated that “based on the entire record in this case, and the totality of the circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11982 - 2017-09-21

State v. Johnny K. Pinder
in this case, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 On September 9, 2003, at approximately 1:30 p.m
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25053 - 2006-05-08

COURT OF APPEALS
on a trial where he’s the judge but he’s not party in the case? [Juror] Eaton: I don’t think it makes any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32512 - 2014-03-26

[PDF] NOTICE
. The circuit court dismissed the case based on that stipulation. Bukowski argues that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27291 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 30, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
serve as a final judgment on the merits. The circuit court dismissed the case based on that stipulation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27291 - 2006-12-19

State v. Burley Harding
in his schedule. The case finally went to trial after eight or nine judges had presided over the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14153 - 2005-05-08

COURT OF APPEALS
in reviewing the records at issue. Leiser argues that the trial court erred in dismissing his case because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81101 - 2012-04-16

State v. Michael A. Senecal
¶3 The facts and procedural history of this case as they bear upon the appellate issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3413 - 2005-03-31