Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12741 - 12750 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
Search results 12741 - 12750 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
Mary Aiello v. Village of Pleasant Prairie
deposit. We determine questions of law de novo, benefiting from the analyses of the circuit court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17016 - 2015-01-19
deposit. We determine questions of law de novo, benefiting from the analyses of the circuit court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17016 - 2015-01-19
Brown County v. Grey C.B.
or its application to a particular set of facts is a question of law this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14248 - 2005-03-31
or its application to a particular set of facts is a question of law this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14248 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review de novo. See id. A defendant seeking resentencing because of allegedly inaccurate information
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193751 - 2017-09-21
review de novo. See id. A defendant seeking resentencing because of allegedly inaccurate information
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193751 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
that we review de novo. Id. ¶7 To prove counsel’s deficiency, Cason must show that “‘counsel made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32730 - 2014-09-15
that we review de novo. Id. ¶7 To prove counsel’s deficiency, Cason must show that “‘counsel made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32730 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of which present questions of law that this court reviews de novo. See Driehaus v. Walworth Cnty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77630 - 2014-09-15
of which present questions of law that this court reviews de novo. See Driehaus v. Walworth Cnty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77630 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed. Before Lundsten, Higginbotham and Bridge, JJ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41620 - 2014-09-15
County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed. Before Lundsten, Higginbotham and Bridge, JJ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41620 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. The circuit court must hold an evidentiary hearing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207660 - 2018-01-24
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. The circuit court must hold an evidentiary hearing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207660 - 2018-01-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo. See State v. Quarzenski, 2007 WI App 212, ¶19, 305 Wis. 2d 525, 739 N.W.2d 844. ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234542 - 2019-02-12
de novo. See State v. Quarzenski, 2007 WI App 212, ¶19, 305 Wis. 2d 525, 739 N.W.2d 844. ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234542 - 2019-02-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
jeopardy protections have been violated is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Steinhardt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=372580 - 2021-06-02
jeopardy protections have been violated is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Steinhardt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=372580 - 2021-06-02
[PDF]
NOTICE
Whether Powell’s motion was procedurally barred by Escalona is a question of law we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41868 - 2014-09-15
Whether Powell’s motion was procedurally barred by Escalona is a question of law we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41868 - 2014-09-15