Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12751 - 12760 of 20381 for sai.
Search results 12751 - 12760 of 20381 for sai.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
mentioned probation and “the possibility of leaving today,” to which the court responded by saying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=717184 - 2023-10-25
mentioned probation and “the possibility of leaving today,” to which the court responded by saying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=717184 - 2023-10-25
Certification
be up in the attic. Latoya did not say she saw cocaine in the attic. Latoya told Matson that she wanted
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52584 - 2010-07-27
be up in the attic. Latoya did not say she saw cocaine in the attic. Latoya told Matson that she wanted
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52584 - 2010-07-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
back. Drawing all reasonable inferences from the evidence in favor of Wilson, we cannot say
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158194 - 2017-09-21
back. Drawing all reasonable inferences from the evidence in favor of Wilson, we cannot say
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158194 - 2017-09-21
Daniel Substad v. Frances Thorson
. The portion of the argument in question is as follows: And counsel says you are not telling the truth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13105 - 2005-03-31
. The portion of the argument in question is as follows: And counsel says you are not telling the truth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13105 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.” The court characterized this statement as “because I say so” testimony. ¶17 In its written decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=907144 - 2025-01-29
.” The court characterized this statement as “because I say so” testimony. ¶17 In its written decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=907144 - 2025-01-29
State v. Calvin R. Clemons
cannot say that the trial court’s ruling admitting the testimony under the excited utterance rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12299 - 2005-03-31
cannot say that the trial court’s ruling admitting the testimony under the excited utterance rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12299 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
only worry, is that is he going to be, as the statute says, safe, or does he pose a risk of harm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87907 - 2014-09-15
only worry, is that is he going to be, as the statute says, safe, or does he pose a risk of harm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87907 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
to describe it as anything other than his paranoia associated with the proceedings. It is, as I say
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107651 - 2014-02-03
to describe it as anything other than his paranoia associated with the proceedings. It is, as I say
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107651 - 2014-02-03
Larry Gates v. Michael Dorshorst
that the chairperson has the power to set the meeting agendas. In his appellate brief, Gates says “this case [has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5925 - 2005-03-31
that the chairperson has the power to set the meeting agendas. In his appellate brief, Gates says “this case [has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5925 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
25th of 2005?[ 6 ] A I’d say for about 45 minutes. Q Now, the date of August 25th of 2005, why
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108345 - 2017-09-21
25th of 2005?[ 6 ] A I’d say for about 45 minutes. Q Now, the date of August 25th of 2005, why
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108345 - 2017-09-21