Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12761 - 12770 of 30115 for de.

[PDF] NOTICE
is a question of law that this court decides de novo. State v. Lechner, 217 Wis. 2d 392, 424, 576 N.W.2d 912
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33533 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Kemakolam Michael Obasih v. Kanelichi Esther Obasih
. 1986) (property division is discretionary). We do not decide the case de novo.1 ¶4 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5875 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Steve Norton
presents a legal issue which we decide de novo. Id. Whether a new factor justifies sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3445 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
reasoning. But our standard of review of the constitutional issue is de novo, so the State’s argument about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130497 - 2014-11-25

Kevin K. Parman v. Jeffrey D. Ogden
of a contract presents a question of law which this court reviews de novo. Borchardt v. Wilk, 156 Wis. 2d 420
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6997 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
sufficient material facts to entitle the defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30039 - 2007-08-20

[PDF] Robert P. Murphy v. MCC, Inc.
of a contract is a question of law we review de novo. Gunka v. Consolidated Papers, Inc., 179 Wis. 2d 525
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4913 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Village of Menomonee Falls v. Paul G. Meyer
of statutory construction which we review de novo. See State v. C.A.J., 148 Wis.2d 137, 139, 434 N.W.2d 800
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14758 - 2017-09-21

State v. Robert E. Irish
] The construction of a statute is a question of law that we review de novo. In re J.W.T., 159 Wis.2d 754, 760-61
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11250 - 2005-03-31

State v. Johnny M. Lacy
has been violated is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See State v. Ziegenhagen, 73
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3946 - 2005-03-31