Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12771 - 12780 of 68392 for did.
Search results 12771 - 12780 of 68392 for did.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. testified that she did not do the SANE examination of A.B., and that it was C.H. who conducted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=568054 - 2022-09-20
. testified that she did not do the SANE examination of A.B., and that it was C.H. who conducted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=568054 - 2022-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
justified. We conclude the circuit court did not erroneously exercise its discretion by determining DHS’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190528 - 2017-09-21
justified. We conclude the circuit court did not erroneously exercise its discretion by determining DHS’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190528 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
elements of the crimes and, therefore, did not understand the nature of the charges. Specifically, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206910 - 2018-01-17
elements of the crimes and, therefore, did not understand the nature of the charges. Specifically, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206910 - 2018-01-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
) and 809.32. 2 Luis G. responded; Jennifer M. did not. After considering the no-merit reports, Luis G.’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100656 - 2017-09-21
) and 809.32. 2 Luis G. responded; Jennifer M. did not. After considering the no-merit reports, Luis G.’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100656 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Doris G.
ad litem’s motion referenced a fourth individual, Barb Resheske, who did not testify. No party has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12159 - 2017-09-21
ad litem’s motion referenced a fourth individual, Barb Resheske, who did not testify. No party has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12159 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
introduce the Illinois judgment of conviction as evidence in the event that Hunt testified that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96841 - 2014-09-15
introduce the Illinois judgment of conviction as evidence in the event that Hunt testified that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96841 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the three charges to which Wilson had pled. The PSI did not specify whether those sentences should run
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=563254 - 2022-09-07
of the three charges to which Wilson had pled. The PSI did not specify whether those sentences should run
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=563254 - 2022-09-07
[PDF]
NOTICE
hearsay objection and did not permit Officer Fasulo to testify that Destiny told him the night
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59522 - 2014-09-15
hearsay objection and did not permit Officer Fasulo to testify that Destiny told him the night
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59522 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
at the same time as those individuals and did not return. ¶11 Michelle Rusch, a forensic scientist from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243135 - 2019-07-02
at the same time as those individuals and did not return. ¶11 Michelle Rusch, a forensic scientist from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243135 - 2019-07-02
State v. Clemente Lamont Alexander
of the motion did not create a reasonable probability of a different outcome at trial. State v. Alexander
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17821 - 2005-04-18
of the motion did not create a reasonable probability of a different outcome at trial. State v. Alexander
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17821 - 2005-04-18