Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12771 - 12780 of 64079 for records/1000.
Search results 12771 - 12780 of 64079 for records/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Paul Wozniak
challenge to Agent Gilson’s “considerable … testimony going over [his] criminal record,” based on the PSIs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11773 - 2017-09-20
challenge to Agent Gilson’s “considerable … testimony going over [his] criminal record,” based on the PSIs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11773 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
WI APP 148
negotiations took place here and no plea agreement was in place. We agree. We note that while the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40411 - 2014-09-15
negotiations took place here and no plea agreement was in place. We agree. We note that while the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40411 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
allowed to proceed pro se. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114369 - 2017-09-21
allowed to proceed pro se. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114369 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=670467 - 2023-06-20
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=670467 - 2023-06-20
COURT OF APPEALS
uncontested factual record of this case, we agree. ¶18 We begin the analysis by noting that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57084 - 2010-11-23
uncontested factual record of this case, we agree. ¶18 We begin the analysis by noting that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57084 - 2010-11-23
Jay W. Smith v. Paul Katz
in the record provides coverage. We conclude that because the alleged property damage took place at some point
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17135 - 2013-09-24
in the record provides coverage. We conclude that because the alleged property damage took place at some point
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17135 - 2013-09-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the evidence available to the State). ¶16 The Record before us fully supports our conclusion, as we explain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1040157 - 2025-11-19
the evidence available to the State). ¶16 The Record before us fully supports our conclusion, as we explain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1040157 - 2025-11-19
[PDF]
State v. Jonathon R. K.
of error is rejected for a number of reasons. The agreement is not part of the record. More importantly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9206 - 2017-09-19
of error is rejected for a number of reasons. The agreement is not part of the record. More importantly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9206 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 137
name is spelled both “Brandon” and “Branden” in the record; we will use the spelling that the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33686 - 2014-09-15
name is spelled both “Brandon” and “Branden” in the record; we will use the spelling that the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33686 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the record, as mandated by Anders, counsel’s report, and Rodriguez’s response, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=546984 - 2022-07-26
the record, as mandated by Anders, counsel’s report, and Rodriguez’s response, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=546984 - 2022-07-26