Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12771 - 12780 of 63609 for records/1000.

Gisella Wood v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
that there was insufficient credible evidence in the record to support LIRC's decision. Because the trial court correctly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8441 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
information that he contends would justify a lesser sentence. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205831 - 2017-12-19

CA Blank Order
to it. Upon consideration of the report, Ingrid G.’s response, and an independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91118 - 2013-01-02

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of these submissions and an independent review of the record, the judgment is summarily affirmed because we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245457 - 2019-08-19

[PDF] State v. Amanda L. Gear
by handling cash and credit cards at her job. Counsel also noted her exemplary record over the first ten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6275 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
actually ordered Green to pay the DNA surcharge that appeared in court records as an obligation. Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69080 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] La Crosse County v. Thomas J. Breidel
and clear preponderance of the evidence. Therefore, we affirm it. The record reflects that Breidel spoke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5195 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
) failing to require the State to place its sentencing recommendation on the record before accepting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35190 - 2014-09-15

Marathon County v. Allison S.C.
to take medication on a regular or routine basis, that the medical records indicated she expressed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11141 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, the appeal was submitted to the court for decision based only on the appellant’s brief and the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142981 - 2017-09-21