Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12771 - 12780 of 59865 for richard riley divorce attorney.
Search results 12771 - 12780 of 59865 for richard riley divorce attorney.
COURT OF APPEALS
attorneys who act as guardians ad litem.” ¶4 The Legal Aid Society has provided guardian ad litem
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59234 - 2011-01-24
attorneys who act as guardians ad litem.” ¶4 The Legal Aid Society has provided guardian ad litem
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59234 - 2011-01-24
[PDF]
NOTICE
of Milwaukee County directs, supervises, reviews or evaluates the performance of [Society] staff attorneys
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59234 - 2014-09-15
of Milwaukee County directs, supervises, reviews or evaluates the performance of [Society] staff attorneys
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59234 - 2014-09-15
Rock Co. DHS v. Bonnie L.
). ¶3 An initial hearing was scheduled for September 27, 2004, before Judge Richard T. Werner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20636 - 2005-12-14
). ¶3 An initial hearing was scheduled for September 27, 2004, before Judge Richard T. Werner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20636 - 2005-12-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
1 The Honorable Richard O. Wright presided at the 2005 plea hearing. The Honorable Bernard N
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190531 - 2017-09-21
1 The Honorable Richard O. Wright presided at the 2005 plea hearing. The Honorable Bernard N
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190531 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Rock Co. DHS v. Bonnie L.
Richard T. Werner. Bonnie did not appear personally at that hearing. Attorney Philip Brehm, who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20636 - 2017-09-21
Richard T. Werner. Bonnie did not appear personally at that hearing. Attorney Philip Brehm, who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20636 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Age at disposition: County and district
Civil 122 117 (96%) 0 (96%) 0 (96%) 2 (98%) 0 (98%) 0 (98%) 1 (98%) 2 (100%) 13 Divorce 74 4 (5%) 2 (8
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/agedispocounty18.pdf - 2019-02-26
Civil 122 117 (96%) 0 (96%) 0 (96%) 2 (98%) 0 (98%) 0 (98%) 1 (98%) 2 (100%) 13 Divorce 74 4 (5%) 2 (8
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/agedispocounty18.pdf - 2019-02-26
[PDF]
Age of Pending - County Wide Report
(100%) 0 (100%) 0 (100%) 0 (100%) 0 (100%) 76 Divorce 44 15 (34%) 2 (39%) 9 (59%) 12 (86%) 0 (86%) 3
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/agependingcounty21.pdf - 2022-02-22
(100%) 0 (100%) 0 (100%) 0 (100%) 0 (100%) 76 Divorce 44 15 (34%) 2 (39%) 9 (59%) 12 (86%) 0 (86%) 3
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/agependingcounty21.pdf - 2022-02-22
[PDF]
Age at disposition: County and district
68 (92%) 0 (92%) 0 (92%) 4 (97%) 0 (97%) 2 (100%) 0 (100%) 0 (100%) 12 Divorce 74 4 (5%) 0 (5%) 21
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/agedispocounty19.pdf - 2020-02-27
68 (92%) 0 (92%) 0 (92%) 4 (97%) 0 (97%) 2 (100%) 0 (100%) 0 (100%) 12 Divorce 74 4 (5%) 0 (5%) 21
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/agedispocounty19.pdf - 2020-02-27
[PDF]
Age of pending: County and district
(64%) 2 (82%) 1 (91%) 0 (91%) 0 (91%) 1 (100%) 158 Divorce 47 12 (26%) 7 (40%) 11 (64%) 11 (87%) 1
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/agependingcounty20.pdf - 2021-02-11
(64%) 2 (82%) 1 (91%) 0 (91%) 0 (91%) 1 (100%) 158 Divorce 47 12 (26%) 7 (40%) 11 (64%) 11 (87%) 1
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/agependingcounty20.pdf - 2021-02-11
[PDF]
Age of pending: County and district
(78%) 2 (100%) 0 (100%) 0 (100%) 0 (100%) 158 Divorce 54 13 (24%) 9 (41%) 13 (65%) 10 (83%) 2 (87%) 4
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/agependingcounty18.pdf - 2019-02-26
(78%) 2 (100%) 0 (100%) 0 (100%) 0 (100%) 158 Divorce 54 13 (24%) 9 (41%) 13 (65%) 10 (83%) 2 (87%) 4
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/agependingcounty18.pdf - 2019-02-26