Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12781 - 12790 of 30128 for consulta de causas.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
found guilty of this violation in municipal court, he appealed for a trial de novo to the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217891 - 2018-08-22

[PDF] NOTICE
. § 802.08(2) (2005-06).3 We review de novo the grant or denial of summary judgment, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32538 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Deborah A. Neas
of a complaint is a matter of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Adams, 152 Wis.2d 68, 74, 447 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11563 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] William Olson v. Sidney Kaprelian
agreement) meet the statutory requirements is a question of law which we review de novo. See Kania v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9560 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Rodney Calhoun
is a question of law which we review de novo. See State v. Wills, 193 Wis.2d 273, 277, 533 N.W.2d 165, 166
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9761 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
to serial litigation is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Tolefree, 209 Wis. 2d 421
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78241 - 2012-02-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
which we review de novo. See id. ¶6 To establish a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91734 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Town of Mount Pleasant v. Gerald A. Hoornstra
is a question of law that we review de novo. See Miller Nat’l Ins. Co. v. City of Milwaukee, 184 Wis.2d 155
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15195 - 2017-09-21

State v. Wells Oswalt
. 1989). Whether facts constitute a “new factor” is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10769 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
reexamination reports show probable cause presents a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Kruse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31305 - 2007-12-26