Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12791 - 12800 of 69131 for he.
Search results 12791 - 12800 of 69131 for he.
[PDF]
State v. Roberto V. Rodriguez
criminal, see WIS. No. 2005AP1265-CR 2 STAT. § 939.62. He also appeals from the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26019 - 2017-09-21
criminal, see WIS. No. 2005AP1265-CR 2 STAT. § 939.62. He also appeals from the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26019 - 2017-09-21
Frontsheet
, and recommending that he be publicly reprimanded. Since Attorney Read failed to present a defense despite being
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90305 - 2013-01-22
, and recommending that he be publicly reprimanded. Since Attorney Read failed to present a defense despite being
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90305 - 2013-01-22
COURT OF APPEALS
Darren Selk testified that he and his partner, Douglas Cook, were dispatched to the Markov residence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103323 - 2013-10-29
Darren Selk testified that he and his partner, Douglas Cook, were dispatched to the Markov residence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103323 - 2013-10-29
COURT OF APPEALS
armed with a dangerous weapon. He further appeals from an order denying without a hearing his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89386 - 2012-11-19
armed with a dangerous weapon. He further appeals from an order denying without a hearing his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89386 - 2012-11-19
COURT OF APPEALS
equipment was stolen. Werdin told Officer Matthew Harris that he believed his wife, Michelle, was the one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64079 - 2011-05-17
equipment was stolen. Werdin told Officer Matthew Harris that he believed his wife, Michelle, was the one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64079 - 2011-05-17
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey L. Mosley
available local co-counsel; (3) that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel; and (4) that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9058 - 2017-09-19
available local co-counsel; (3) that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel; and (4) that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9058 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
—were reinstated against Kelly. ¶4 Kelly entered into a plea agreement in July 2014 in which he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216475 - 2018-07-31
—were reinstated against Kelly. ¶4 Kelly entered into a plea agreement in July 2014 in which he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216475 - 2018-07-31
CA Blank Order
broke into the building through a basement window. He then broke into the wrong apartment, walked
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105274 - 2013-12-03
broke into the building through a basement window. He then broke into the wrong apartment, walked
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105274 - 2013-12-03
COURT OF APPEALS
by claiming that it had no jurisdiction over his case and by denying his motion for reconsideration. He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80607 - 2012-04-09
by claiming that it had no jurisdiction over his case and by denying his motion for reconsideration. He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80607 - 2012-04-09
State v. James Nesbitt
that the repeater portion of his sentence was not authorized by law because he did not admit and the State failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13113 - 2005-03-31
that the repeater portion of his sentence was not authorized by law because he did not admit and the State failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13113 - 2005-03-31