Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12791 - 12800 of 50108 for our.
Search results 12791 - 12800 of 50108 for our.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
RULE 809.21. After our independent review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257467 - 2020-04-16
RULE 809.21. After our independent review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257467 - 2020-04-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the circuit court construed as a motion under WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2023-24).1 Based upon our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989750 - 2025-07-29
the circuit court construed as a motion under WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2023-24).1 Based upon our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989750 - 2025-07-29
COURT OF APPEALS
of costs on appeal. The court awarded $3567.35 in costs against Morters. The supreme court reversed our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35259 - 2009-01-20
of costs on appeal. The court awarded $3567.35 in costs against Morters. The supreme court reversed our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35259 - 2009-01-20
Joseph Ray Halsted v. Society Insurance Company
that distinction from our examination of Rudig’s deposition testimony. At the deposition, counsel repeatedly asked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4379 - 2005-03-31
that distinction from our examination of Rudig’s deposition testimony. At the deposition, counsel repeatedly asked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4379 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, for failing to seek a plea withdrawal at the time of sentencing. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=925282 - 2025-03-11
, for failing to seek a plea withdrawal at the time of sentencing. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=925282 - 2025-03-11
COURT OF APPEALS
the testimony of the other witnesses. Given our highly deferential review of the municipal court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50828 - 2010-06-09
the testimony of the other witnesses. Given our highly deferential review of the municipal court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50828 - 2010-06-09
CA Blank Order
and whether the sentence was the result of an erroneous exercise of discretion. Our review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110531 - 2014-04-22
and whether the sentence was the result of an erroneous exercise of discretion. Our review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110531 - 2014-04-22
[PDF]
State v. Talib Amin Akbar
summarily vacated our decision and remanded for further consideration in this court in light of Prihoda
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2311 - 2017-09-19
summarily vacated our decision and remanded for further consideration in this court in light of Prihoda
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2311 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to file a response, and has elected not to do so. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243911 - 2019-07-24
to file a response, and has elected not to do so. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243911 - 2019-07-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
relief and reconsideration. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173368 - 2017-09-21
relief and reconsideration. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173368 - 2017-09-21