Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12791 - 12800 of 46101 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 12791 - 12800 of 46101 for paternity test paper work.
[PDF]
State v. Timothy S. Kuklinski
for refusing to submit to breath testing. The issues on appeal are (1) whether the state lawfully arrested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10777 - 2017-09-20
for refusing to submit to breath testing. The issues on appeal are (1) whether the state lawfully arrested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10777 - 2017-09-20
State v. Gregg A. Pfaff
to a polygraph, (2) failing to apply the proper test when ruling on probable cause to arrest, (3) permitting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6473 - 2005-03-31
to a polygraph, (2) failing to apply the proper test when ruling on probable cause to arrest, (3) permitting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6473 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
preliminary breath test (PBT) 2 on the basis that the officer who administered the test lacked probable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192020 - 2017-09-21
preliminary breath test (PBT) 2 on the basis that the officer who administered the test lacked probable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192020 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Robert C. Niebuhr
driving privileges for refusal to submit to a breath test. For the following reasons, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3546 - 2017-09-19
driving privileges for refusal to submit to a breath test. For the following reasons, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3546 - 2017-09-19
State v. Milton H. Smith
refused to submit to a chemical test under the implied consent law, as well as an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15286 - 2005-03-31
refused to submit to a chemical test under the implied consent law, as well as an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15286 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Milton H. Smith
to a chemical test under the implied consent law, as well as an order denying his motion for relief from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15286 - 2017-09-21
to a chemical test under the implied consent law, as well as an order denying his motion for relief from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15286 - 2017-09-21
State v. Robert C. Niebuhr
to a breath test. For the following reasons, we affirm. FACTS ¶2 On September 25, 1999, Niebuhr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3546 - 2005-03-31
to a breath test. For the following reasons, we affirm. FACTS ¶2 On September 25, 1999, Niebuhr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3546 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
testing of his blood, 1 This appeal is decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208082 - 2018-02-06
testing of his blood, 1 This appeal is decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208082 - 2018-02-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of his post-arrest breath test into evidence. We disagree and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Oneida County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144944 - 2017-09-21
of his post-arrest breath test into evidence. We disagree and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Oneida County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144944 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
post-arrest breath test into evidence. We disagree and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Oneida County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144944 - 2015-07-27
post-arrest breath test into evidence. We disagree and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Oneida County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144944 - 2015-07-27