Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1281 - 1290 of 60749 for Real Estate attorney SC.

[PDF] Vivian Jensen v. John A. Jrolf
, or interest in certain real estate owned by Vivian Jensen. Jrolf contends that he had complied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10394 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Richard Zeininger v. Affordable Builders of Wisconsin, Inc.
under the law governing real estate purchase contracts. We hold, however, that the overall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8349 - 2017-09-19

Richard Zeininger v. Affordable Builders of Wisconsin, Inc.
was defective under the law governing real estate purchase contracts. We hold, however, that the overall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8349 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Michael A. Yamat v. Verma L. B.
. Michael A. Yamat appeals from an order denying his request for attorney fees from Verma L. B.’s estate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11258 - 2017-09-19

Michael A. Yamat v. Verma L. B.
and estate. The trial court’s order gave Attorney Yamat authority to admit Verma to a nursing home or other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11258 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Lynn Wonka v. Samuel Cari
the proceeds from the sale of real estate of the Estate of Edward Bierbrauer. The Wonkas argue that Edward
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3522 - 2017-09-19

Monica A. Tanner v. Julie A. Williams
against Williams for alleged misrepresentation as to the condition of a basement in a real estate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5410 - 2005-03-31

Suzanne Marie Johnson v. Norman T. Johnson
cards. Norman made all of the mortgage payments, and paid the real estate taxes and utilities
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14132 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Monica A. Tanner v. Julie A. Williams
for alleged misrepresentation as to the condition of a basement in a real estate transaction. Tanner claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5410 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
sold the property in 2009 to a real estate investment group for $4,459,470. The property was sold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181718 - 2017-09-21