Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1281 - 1290 of 30059 for de.
Search results 1281 - 1290 of 30059 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to uncontested facts is a question of law that I review de novo. State v. Rydeski, 214 Wis. 2d 101, 106, 571
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106102 - 2017-09-21
to uncontested facts is a question of law that I review de novo. State v. Rydeski, 214 Wis. 2d 101, 106, 571
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106102 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
amount owed to $1803.34. Nierenberger then requested a trial de novo, and a court trial was held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102985 - 2017-09-21
amount owed to $1803.34. Nierenberger then requested a trial de novo, and a court trial was held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102985 - 2017-09-21
Lakisha Dahm v. City of Milwaukee
, is entitled to the pension. As noted, the trial court disagreed. II. ¶4 We review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20310 - 2006-01-09
, is entitled to the pension. As noted, the trial court disagreed. II. ¶4 We review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20310 - 2006-01-09
[PDF]
Brown County Department of Human Services v. Terrance M.
., of De Pere. 2005 WI App 57 NOTICE COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7644 - 2017-09-19
., of De Pere. 2005 WI App 57 NOTICE COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7644 - 2017-09-19
Brown County Department of Human Services v. Terrance M.
, the cause was submitted on the brief of Thomas J. Walsh of Walsh & Walsh, S.C., of De Pere. 2005 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7643 - 2005-03-31
, the cause was submitted on the brief of Thomas J. Walsh of Walsh & Walsh, S.C., of De Pere. 2005 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7643 - 2005-03-31
Gary B. Larsen v. Karen S. Larsen
a question of law, which we review de novo. Ondrasek v. Tenneson, 158 Wis.2d 690, 694, 462 N.W.2d 915, 917
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10673 - 2005-03-31
a question of law, which we review de novo. Ondrasek v. Tenneson, 158 Wis.2d 690, 694, 462 N.W.2d 915, 917
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10673 - 2005-03-31
State v. Charles Jasper, Jr.
we review de novo. Id. “[I]f the defendant fails to allege sufficient facts in his motion to raise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2440 - 2005-03-31
we review de novo. Id. “[I]f the defendant fails to allege sufficient facts in his motion to raise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2440 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Margaret Smith v. Richard Golde
of § 807.01(3) and (4). Applying a statute to a set of facts is a question of law we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3384 - 2017-09-19
of § 807.01(3) and (4). Applying a statute to a set of facts is a question of law we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3384 - 2017-09-19
State v. Ronald Leroy Beilke
entitle the defendant to relief is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. [I]f the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12430 - 2005-03-31
entitle the defendant to relief is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. [I]f the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12430 - 2005-03-31
Tower Insurance Company, Inc. v. Cindy Chang
not reach their immunity argument. We review the trial court’s summary judgment de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14907 - 2005-03-31
not reach their immunity argument. We review the trial court’s summary judgment de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14907 - 2005-03-31