Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1281 - 1290 of 20930 for word.
Search results 1281 - 1290 of 20930 for word.
[PDF]
State v. Francisco Mata
no reference to § 941.23. Looking to the unambiguous words of § 941.23, STATS., it is clear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9054 - 2017-09-19
no reference to § 941.23. Looking to the unambiguous words of § 941.23, STATS., it is clear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9054 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Annette Petrowsky v. Brad Krause
. App. 1985). This meaning may be found in a standard dictionary, as long as the words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12815 - 2017-09-21
. App. 1985). This meaning may be found in a standard dictionary, as long as the words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12815 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
analysis: Even if Hogan had not uttered another word, that statement is subject to competing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141545 - 2017-09-21
analysis: Even if Hogan had not uttered another word, that statement is subject to competing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141545 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of word “gimmick” in the rebuttal portion of his closing argument when referring to the absence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130721 - 2017-09-21
of word “gimmick” in the rebuttal portion of his closing argument when referring to the absence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130721 - 2017-09-21
Joseph W. Volkmann v. Superior Home Services, Inc.
456, 461, 322 N.W.2d 482 (Ct. App. 1982). Words or phrases in a contract are ambiguous when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4689 - 2005-03-31
456, 461, 322 N.W.2d 482 (Ct. App. 1982). Words or phrases in a contract are ambiguous when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4689 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrie C.B.
). Words in a statute are to be construed according to the common and approved usage, § 990.01(1), STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12933 - 2017-09-21
). Words in a statute are to be construed according to the common and approved usage, § 990.01(1), STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12933 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Randolph A. Clark
the form “[w]ord for word.” Clark admitted during his testimony that he refused to submit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5197 - 2017-09-19
the form “[w]ord for word.” Clark admitted during his testimony that he refused to submit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5197 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
not uttered another word, that statement is subject to competing interpretations. It could mean that Hogan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141545 - 2015-05-11
not uttered another word, that statement is subject to competing interpretations. It could mean that Hogan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141545 - 2015-05-11
State v. Jeffrie C.B.
). Words in a statute are to be construed according to the common and approved usage, § 990.01(1), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12933 - 2005-03-31
). Words in a statute are to be construed according to the common and approved usage, § 990.01(1), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12933 - 2005-03-31
Annette Petrowsky v. Brad Krause
dictionary, as long as the words are not technical. See Wisconsin Prof’l Police Ass’n v. Waukesha County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12815 - 2005-03-31
dictionary, as long as the words are not technical. See Wisconsin Prof’l Police Ass’n v. Waukesha County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12815 - 2005-03-31