Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1281 - 1290 of 20925 for word.
Search results 1281 - 1290 of 20925 for word.
[PDF]
WI 4
, ordinary, and accepted meaning, except that technical or specially-defined words or phrases are given
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=912027 - 2025-02-07
, ordinary, and accepted meaning, except that technical or specially-defined words or phrases are given
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=912027 - 2025-02-07
[PDF]
Certification
. § 973.046(1r) (2015-16). The State contends the word “shall” is presumed mandatory and will be construed
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195459 - 2017-09-21
. § 973.046(1r) (2015-16). The State contends the word “shall” is presumed mandatory and will be construed
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195459 - 2017-09-21
State v. Timothy Netzer
: In this case, defendant’s words show the physical manifestations of intoxication. The words were admitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12587 - 2005-03-31
: In this case, defendant’s words show the physical manifestations of intoxication. The words were admitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12587 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
: “This quite frankly was a rape in every sense of the word.” The prosecutor also told the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=850299 - 2024-09-18
: “This quite frankly was a rape in every sense of the word.” The prosecutor also told the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=850299 - 2024-09-18
[PDF]
Joseph W. Volkmann v. Superior Home Services, Inc.
Wis. 2d 456, 461, 322 N.W.2d 482 (Ct. App. 1982). Words or phrases in a contract are ambiguous when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4689 - 2017-09-19
Wis. 2d 456, 461, 322 N.W.2d 482 (Ct. App. 1982). Words or phrases in a contract are ambiguous when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4689 - 2017-09-19
State v. Maurice C.
order subsequent to conditions established by this additional order. “All words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13677 - 2005-03-31
order subsequent to conditions established by this additional order. “All words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13677 - 2005-03-31
Annette Petrowsky v. Brad Krause
dictionary, as long as the words are not technical. See Wisconsin Prof’l Police Ass’n v. Waukesha County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12815 - 2005-03-31
dictionary, as long as the words are not technical. See Wisconsin Prof’l Police Ass’n v. Waukesha County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12815 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Randolph A. Clark
the form “[w]ord for word.” Clark admitted during his testimony that he refused to submit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5197 - 2017-09-19
the form “[w]ord for word.” Clark admitted during his testimony that he refused to submit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5197 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jose A. Sianez
no reference to § 941.23. Looking to the unambiguous words of § 941.23, STATS., it is clear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9090 - 2017-09-19
no reference to § 941.23. Looking to the unambiguous words of § 941.23, STATS., it is clear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9090 - 2017-09-19
Clyde W. Harger v. Caterpillar, Inc.
because the language defining the second class is in the conjunctive, not the disjunctive. In other words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2314 - 2005-03-31
because the language defining the second class is in the conjunctive, not the disjunctive. In other words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2314 - 2005-03-31