Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12801 - 12810 of 30012 for consulta de causas.
Search results 12801 - 12810 of 30012 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
State v. Susan M. Curtis
, 356, 525 N.W.2d 102 (Ct. App. 1994). However, despite our de novo standard of review, we value
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2939 - 2017-09-19
, 356, 525 N.W.2d 102 (Ct. App. 1994). However, despite our de novo standard of review, we value
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2939 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on the deficiency prong. ¶8 Whether trial counsel performed deficiently is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240499 - 2019-05-09
on the deficiency prong. ¶8 Whether trial counsel performed deficiently is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240499 - 2019-05-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was deficient and whether the deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209558 - 2018-03-13
was deficient and whether the deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209558 - 2018-03-13
[PDF]
NOTICE
in a reasonable way. Brandon S.S., 179 Wis. 2d at 150, 507 N.W.2d at 107. We review de novo whether the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26677 - 2014-09-15
in a reasonable way. Brandon S.S., 179 Wis. 2d at 150, 507 N.W.2d at 107. We review de novo whether the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26677 - 2014-09-15
State v. Dennis H.
of law this court reviews de novo. K.N.K., 139 Wis. 2d at 198. ¶10 To succeed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7609 - 2005-03-31
of law this court reviews de novo. K.N.K., 139 Wis. 2d at 198. ¶10 To succeed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7609 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶5 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31963 - 2008-02-27
. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶5 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31963 - 2008-02-27
State v. Jesse J. C.
exercise of discretion de novo, but we will not disturb the trial court’s factual findings unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2743 - 2005-03-31
exercise of discretion de novo, but we will not disturb the trial court’s factual findings unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2743 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, which is subject to de novo review. See State v. Guzman, 166 Wis. 2d 577, 586, 480 N.W.2d 446 (1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107884 - 2017-09-21
, which is subject to de novo review. See State v. Guzman, 166 Wis. 2d 577, 586, 480 N.W.2d 446 (1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107884 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 188
was sufficient under WIS. STAT. RULE 807.01(3). This presents a matter of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34702 - 2014-09-15
was sufficient under WIS. STAT. RULE 807.01(3). This presents a matter of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34702 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, are questions of law that this court determines de novo. See Dietrich v. Elliot, 190 Wis. 2d 816, 824, 528
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=553686 - 2022-08-11
, are questions of law that this court determines de novo. See Dietrich v. Elliot, 190 Wis. 2d 816, 824, 528
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=553686 - 2022-08-11