Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12801 - 12810 of 50100 for our.
Search results 12801 - 12810 of 50100 for our.
COURT OF APPEALS
. This is a question of statutory interpretation and therefore subject to our independent review. See State v. Long
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46061 - 2010-01-19
. This is a question of statutory interpretation and therefore subject to our independent review. See State v. Long
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46061 - 2010-01-19
John D. Hennick v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
., violates the uniformity clause of the Wisconsin Constitution. We disagree. Our state constitution's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9956 - 2005-03-31
., violates the uniformity clause of the Wisconsin Constitution. We disagree. Our state constitution's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9956 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
upon our No. 2019AP2087-CR 2 review of the briefs and the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=420196 - 2021-09-08
upon our No. 2019AP2087-CR 2 review of the briefs and the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=420196 - 2021-09-08
CA Blank Order
lack arguable merit. Our review of a sentencing determination begins with a “presumption
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142829 - 2015-06-03
lack arguable merit. Our review of a sentencing determination begins with a “presumption
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142829 - 2015-06-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. In our review of a court trial decision, the trial court’s findings of fact “may not be disturbed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226494 - 2018-11-06
. In our review of a court trial decision, the trial court’s findings of fact “may not be disturbed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226494 - 2018-11-06
Debra Louise Groff v. Jeffrey Alan Groff
discretion when it divided the property. Our review of the record establishes that the court considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18407 - 2005-06-07
discretion when it divided the property. Our review of the record establishes that the court considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18407 - 2005-06-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. § 974.06 (2023-24)1 motion for postconviction relief. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1016666 - 2025-09-30
. § 974.06 (2023-24)1 motion for postconviction relief. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1016666 - 2025-09-30
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
. 2d 62, 716 N.W.2d 886. A challenge to Hansen’s sentence would also lack arguable merit. Our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91315 - 2014-09-15
. 2d 62, 716 N.W.2d 886. A challenge to Hansen’s sentence would also lack arguable merit. Our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91315 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
its motion for reconsideration. On our de novo review, we conclude No. 2011AP1517-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80921 - 2014-09-15
its motion for reconsideration. On our de novo review, we conclude No. 2011AP1517-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80921 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
exercised its sentencing discretion. Based upon our review of the Records, we are satisfied
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=667500 - 2023-06-14
exercised its sentencing discretion. Based upon our review of the Records, we are satisfied
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=667500 - 2023-06-14