Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12811 - 12820 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
Search results 12811 - 12820 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
State v. Anthony Johnson
was justified under the “plain view” exception to the warrant requirement is subject to this court's de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9964 - 2005-03-31
was justified under the “plain view” exception to the warrant requirement is subject to this court's de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9964 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
performance was deficient and whether the deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145352 - 2015-07-27
performance was deficient and whether the deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145352 - 2015-07-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo. State v. Stary, 187 Wis. 2d 266, 269, 522 N.W.2d 32 (Ct. App. 1994). ¶9 WISCONSIN STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64700 - 2014-09-15
de novo. State v. Stary, 187 Wis. 2d 266, 269, 522 N.W.2d 32 (Ct. App. 1994). ¶9 WISCONSIN STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64700 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. Secrist, 224 Wis. 2d 201, ¶11. Based on our independent review, we agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30399 - 2007-09-26
review de novo. Secrist, 224 Wis. 2d 201, ¶11. Based on our independent review, we agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30399 - 2007-09-26
Sandra J. Nix v. Broy Company Manufacturing & Sales, Inc.
de novo, independent of the trial court's determination. Id. We examine the record to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9168 - 2005-03-31
de novo, independent of the trial court's determination. Id. We examine the record to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9168 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. at 128. Finally, we need not address both Strickland
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160330 - 2017-09-21
a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. at 128. Finally, we need not address both Strickland
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160330 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Cincinnati Insurance Company v. Mayfair Property, Inc.
of summary judgment de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816, 820
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15184 - 2017-09-21
of summary judgment de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816, 820
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15184 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
which relief can be granted presents a question of law subject to de novo appellate review. DeBruin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191675 - 2017-09-21
which relief can be granted presents a question of law subject to de novo appellate review. DeBruin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191675 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
). Carson lobbies for a de novo review, however, because Judge Torhorst did not preside over the underlying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35258 - 2009-01-20
). Carson lobbies for a de novo review, however, because Judge Torhorst did not preside over the underlying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35258 - 2009-01-20
State v. Paul L. Minnig
” under Wis. Stat. § 346.61.[2] This is a question of statutory interpretation that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7466 - 2005-03-31
” under Wis. Stat. § 346.61.[2] This is a question of statutory interpretation that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7466 - 2005-03-31