Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12811 - 12820 of 50100 for our.
Search results 12811 - 12820 of 50100 for our.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. In our review of a court trial decision, the trial court’s findings of fact “may not be disturbed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226494 - 2018-11-06
. In our review of a court trial decision, the trial court’s findings of fact “may not be disturbed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226494 - 2018-11-06
Debra Louise Groff v. Jeffrey Alan Groff
discretion when it divided the property. Our review of the record establishes that the court considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18407 - 2005-06-07
discretion when it divided the property. Our review of the record establishes that the court considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18407 - 2005-06-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. § 974.06 (2023-24)1 motion for postconviction relief. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1016666 - 2025-09-30
. § 974.06 (2023-24)1 motion for postconviction relief. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1016666 - 2025-09-30
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
. 2d 62, 716 N.W.2d 886. A challenge to Hansen’s sentence would also lack arguable merit. Our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91315 - 2014-09-15
. 2d 62, 716 N.W.2d 886. A challenge to Hansen’s sentence would also lack arguable merit. Our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91315 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
its motion for reconsideration. On our de novo review, we conclude No. 2011AP1517-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80921 - 2014-09-15
its motion for reconsideration. On our de novo review, we conclude No. 2011AP1517-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80921 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
exercised its sentencing discretion. Based upon our review of the Records, we are satisfied
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=667500 - 2023-06-14
exercised its sentencing discretion. Based upon our review of the Records, we are satisfied
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=667500 - 2023-06-14
[PDF]
State v. Jerry Lee Cox
, 76 Wis.2d 277, 282, 251 N.W.2d 65, 67-68 (1977). Our review of the sentencing transcript reveals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13800 - 2014-09-15
, 76 Wis.2d 277, 282, 251 N.W.2d 65, 67-68 (1977). Our review of the sentencing transcript reveals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13800 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of his probation. Priesler was advised of his right to respond and has not responded. Upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261319 - 2020-05-19
of his probation. Priesler was advised of his right to respond and has not responded. Upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261319 - 2020-05-19
[PDF]
Kathryn M. Leute v. Robert L. Leute
. 1 By our own motion, this appeal was expedited. Rule 809.17, STATS. No. 95-0332
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8600 - 2017-09-19
. 1 By our own motion, this appeal was expedited. Rule 809.17, STATS. No. 95-0332
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8600 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
right to appeal by his no contest plea. While noting that our state courts have found that WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=310262 - 2020-12-02
right to appeal by his no contest plea. While noting that our state courts have found that WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=310262 - 2020-12-02