Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12821 - 12830 of 30142 for consulta de causas.
Search results 12821 - 12830 of 30142 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
State v. Encarnacion F.
. However, whether a stop or search was reasonable, given those facts, is a question of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14501 - 2017-09-21
. However, whether a stop or search was reasonable, given those facts, is a question of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14501 - 2017-09-21
State v. Craig T. Bates
is a question of law which we review de novo without deference to the trial court’s conclusion. See Moats, 156
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11523 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law which we review de novo without deference to the trial court’s conclusion. See Moats, 156
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11523 - 2005-03-31
Aaron Ben Woods v. Kenneth Morgan
action, we apply a de novo standard to issues of law. See State ex rel. McMillian v. Dickey, 132 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13514 - 2005-03-31
action, we apply a de novo standard to issues of law. See State ex rel. McMillian v. Dickey, 132 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13514 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” WIS. STAT. § 802.08(2) (2011-12) 3 . We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131986 - 2017-09-21
“is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” WIS. STAT. § 802.08(2) (2011-12) 3 . We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131986 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was deficient and whether the deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145352 - 2017-09-21
was deficient and whether the deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145352 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Wade T. Jones
Whether undisputed facts constitute probable cause is a question of law which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2251 - 2017-09-19
Whether undisputed facts constitute probable cause is a question of law which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2251 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Donald L. Mulder v. Economy Preferred Insurance Company
. Our review of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment is also de novo, and we apply the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2768 - 2017-09-19
. Our review of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment is also de novo, and we apply the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2768 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Karl Julius James v. Gary R. McCaughtry
, 623, 445 N.W.2d 693, 694 (Ct. App. 1989) (appellate court conducts de novo review of record) and Van
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12811 - 2017-09-21
, 623, 445 N.W.2d 693, 694 (Ct. App. 1989) (appellate court conducts de novo review of record) and Van
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12811 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Benjamin L. Stewart
- constitutional requirement of consent is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. at 230-31, 233, 501 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8917 - 2017-09-19
- constitutional requirement of consent is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. at 230-31, 233, 501 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8917 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
principles to the facts as found by the circuit court presents a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34862 - 2014-09-15
principles to the facts as found by the circuit court presents a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34862 - 2014-09-15