Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12821 - 12830 of 73030 for we.
Search results 12821 - 12830 of 73030 for we.
State v. Lisa L. Lappley
a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant (OMVWI). We disagree and affirm the revocation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19776 - 2005-09-28
a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant (OMVWI). We disagree and affirm the revocation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19776 - 2005-09-28
State v. Russell L. Zuerner
requirement. We reject Zuerner’s contentions and affirm the appealed judgment insofar as it convicts him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4344 - 2005-03-31
requirement. We reject Zuerner’s contentions and affirm the appealed judgment insofar as it convicts him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4344 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
instructions, does not support application of the mandatory minimum. We agree and, therefore, reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71521 - 2011-09-28
instructions, does not support application of the mandatory minimum. We agree and, therefore, reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71521 - 2011-09-28
[PDF]
NOTICE
its sentencing discretion. We reject his contentions and affirm. No. 2007AP235-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31095 - 2014-09-15
its sentencing discretion. We reject his contentions and affirm. No. 2007AP235-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31095 - 2014-09-15
John D. Lucin v. Ed B. Altmann
for summary judgment because material questions of fact are in dispute. We conclude that a factual dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16094 - 2005-03-31
for summary judgment because material questions of fact are in dispute. We conclude that a factual dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16094 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
not recognize an anticipatory invocation of Miranda rights, we uphold the trial court’s order denying Luko’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35908 - 2009-03-17
not recognize an anticipatory invocation of Miranda rights, we uphold the trial court’s order denying Luko’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35908 - 2009-03-17
[PDF]
Jennifer Boucher v. North Memorial Medical Center
of the settlement proceeds to her attorney for fees on an unrelated legal matter, we reverse the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14051 - 2014-09-15
of the settlement proceeds to her attorney for fees on an unrelated legal matter, we reverse the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14051 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
that the circuit court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. We reject his contentions and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31095 - 2007-12-10
that the circuit court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. We reject his contentions and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31095 - 2007-12-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we 1 Weidner presents a second
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=540095 - 2022-07-06
and record, we 1 Weidner presents a second
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=540095 - 2022-07-06
[PDF]
NOTICE
persuades us. We affirm. ¶2 After a three-day trial, a jury found McAlister guilty of being involved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41241 - 2014-09-15
persuades us. We affirm. ¶2 After a three-day trial, a jury found McAlister guilty of being involved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41241 - 2014-09-15