Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12831 - 12840 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
Search results 12831 - 12840 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
State v. Brenda K. Pierstorff
that we review de novo. State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis.2d 349, 356, 525 N.W.2d 102, 104 (Ct. App. 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12354 - 2005-03-31
that we review de novo. State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis.2d 349, 356, 525 N.W.2d 102, 104 (Ct. App. 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12354 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mark L. Stewart
subject to de novo review. Id., ¶10. ¶7 In State v. Klessig, 211 Wis. 2d 194
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21509 - 2006-02-22
subject to de novo review. Id., ¶10. ¶7 In State v. Klessig, 211 Wis. 2d 194
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21509 - 2006-02-22
COURT OF APPEALS
of a statutory offer of judgment de novo. See Staehler v. Beuthin, 206 Wis. 2d 610, 624, 557 N.W.2d 487 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65817 - 2011-06-14
of a statutory offer of judgment de novo. See Staehler v. Beuthin, 206 Wis. 2d 610, 624, 557 N.W.2d 487 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65817 - 2011-06-14
State v. Paul L. Minnig
” under Wis. Stat. § 346.61.[2] This is a question of statutory interpretation that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7466 - 2005-03-31
” under Wis. Stat. § 346.61.[2] This is a question of statutory interpretation that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7466 - 2005-03-31
Ramiro Estrada v. State
of law de novo. See Michael A.P. v. Solsrud, 178 Wis.2d 137, 148, 502 N.W.2d 918, 923 (Ct. App. 1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14691 - 2005-03-31
of law de novo. See Michael A.P. v. Solsrud, 178 Wis.2d 137, 148, 502 N.W.2d 918, 923 (Ct. App. 1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14691 - 2005-03-31
State v. Turnel W. Smith
, § 946.42, Stats. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law which we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12016 - 2005-03-31
, § 946.42, Stats. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law which we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12016 - 2005-03-31
St. Croix County v. Adam Douglas Cress
constitutional rights is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v. King, 175 Wis. 2d 146, 150
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3353 - 2005-03-31
constitutional rights is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v. King, 175 Wis. 2d 146, 150
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3353 - 2005-03-31
2008 WI APP 28
, statutory construction is a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Cole, 2000 WI App 52, ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31679 - 2008-03-05
, statutory construction is a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Cole, 2000 WI App 52, ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31679 - 2008-03-05
State v. Stanley R. Scott
, is a question of law subject to de novo review.” Id. In State v. Mitchell, 167 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11689 - 2005-03-31
, is a question of law subject to de novo review.” Id. In State v. Mitchell, 167 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11689 - 2005-03-31
State v. Deborah A. Neas
is a matter of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Adams, 152 Wis.2d 68, 74, 447 N.W.2d 90, 92 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11563 - 2005-03-31
is a matter of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Adams, 152 Wis.2d 68, 74, 447 N.W.2d 90, 92 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11563 - 2005-03-31