Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12831 - 12840 of 56375 for so.
Search results 12831 - 12840 of 56375 for so.
Washington County v. Carl J. Wagner
victim, Myles Metzger, and his mother, Patricia Metzger, so their testimony is uncontroverted.[2] ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26373 - 2006-09-05
victim, Myles Metzger, and his mother, Patricia Metzger, so their testimony is uncontroverted.[2] ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26373 - 2006-09-05
COURT OF APPEALS
with the situation where the trial judge who imposed the revocation sentence did so without reviewing the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36732 - 2009-06-08
with the situation where the trial judge who imposed the revocation sentence did so without reviewing the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36732 - 2009-06-08
State v. Thomas F. W.
, Church moved to allow Thomas to stipulate to a forty-five day extension of his commitment so that Sommers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3292 - 2005-03-31
, Church moved to allow Thomas to stipulate to a forty-five day extension of his commitment so that Sommers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3292 - 2005-03-31
State v. Wesley S. Leonard
within ten days. He did not do so and his license was revoked for three years effective July 18, 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14961 - 2005-03-31
within ten days. He did not do so and his license was revoked for three years effective July 18, 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14961 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 15, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
and at sentencing as a mitigating factor. She faults trial counsel for not doing so. She also argues that her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27102 - 2006-11-14
and at sentencing as a mitigating factor. She faults trial counsel for not doing so. She also argues that her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27102 - 2006-11-14
John Riegleman v. State of Wisconsin Chiropractic Examining Board
and buttocks area during the visits; that Riegleman never asked Pfeifer to remove his pants so that he could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4359 - 2005-03-31
and buttocks area during the visits; that Riegleman never asked Pfeifer to remove his pants so that he could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4359 - 2005-03-31
State v. Neil E. Wakershauser
of these matters took place in October, so I assume that you would have talked to them sometime in October
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3521 - 2013-05-21
of these matters took place in October, so I assume that you would have talked to them sometime in October
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3521 - 2013-05-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 973.15(2)(a). ¶6 A sentence is unduly harsh when it is “so excessive and unusual and so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33618 - 2014-09-15
. § 973.15(2)(a). ¶6 A sentence is unduly harsh when it is “so excessive and unusual and so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33618 - 2014-09-15
Merlin Weber v. Town of Saukville
", JUDGE: RICHARD T. BECKER so indicate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8076 - 2005-03-31
", JUDGE: RICHARD T. BECKER so indicate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8076 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David A. Krier
, Krier agreed to take the test. He testified that he did so because Deputy Olson claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14912 - 2017-09-21
, Krier agreed to take the test. He testified that he did so because Deputy Olson claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14912 - 2017-09-21