Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12841 - 12850 of 69076 for he.
Search results 12841 - 12850 of 69076 for he.
[PDF]
WI APP 45
Rejholec that he would be unable to testify at trial if he obtained a lawyer: “You’re not going to get
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=374368 - 2021-08-19
Rejholec that he would be unable to testify at trial if he obtained a lawyer: “You’re not going to get
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=374368 - 2021-08-19
[PDF]
State v. Mark Inglin
)(a), STATS. 1 He also appeals from the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Inglin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13173 - 2017-09-21
)(a), STATS. 1 He also appeals from the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Inglin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13173 - 2017-09-21
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michael G. Trewin
from a referee's report concluding that he engaged in professional misconduct and recommending that his
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16700 - 2005-03-31
from a referee's report concluding that he engaged in professional misconduct and recommending that his
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16700 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
for postconviction relief. Keil asserts he received ineffective assistance of counsel because his attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36451 - 2014-09-15
for postconviction relief. Keil asserts he received ineffective assistance of counsel because his attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36451 - 2014-09-15
Dolores L. Gilbert v. Raymond L. Gilbert
when he was unable to travel to Wisconsin. It is within the trial court's discretion to adjourn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7827 - 2005-03-31
when he was unable to travel to Wisconsin. It is within the trial court's discretion to adjourn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7827 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
a ninety-day redemption period. We reject Mason’s first two arguments because he was not prejudiced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28108 - 2014-09-15
a ninety-day redemption period. We reject Mason’s first two arguments because he was not prejudiced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28108 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). Therefore, though Walters was convicted of counts one and two, he was sentenced only in connection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135550 - 2017-09-21
). Therefore, though Walters was convicted of counts one and two, he was sentenced only in connection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135550 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
Jones that if he pled guilty to one count of burglary, it would recommend an eighteen-month sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109391 - 2014-03-25
Jones that if he pled guilty to one count of burglary, it would recommend an eighteen-month sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109391 - 2014-03-25
State v. Dillard Earl Kelley, Sr.
for reconsideration in which he argued that the newly discovered evidence, upon which part of the postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19223 - 2005-08-08
for reconsideration in which he argued that the newly discovered evidence, upon which part of the postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19223 - 2005-08-08
State v. Jessie L. Fitzl
appeals his judgment of conviction for substantial battery, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 940.19(2).[1] He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3564 - 2005-03-31
appeals his judgment of conviction for substantial battery, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 940.19(2).[1] He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3564 - 2005-03-31