Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12841 - 12850 of 51774 for him.

COURT OF APPEALS
, testified he left a voicemail for Andrews in August 2008, informing him his bike had been towed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53699 - 2010-08-23

[PDF] CA Blank Order
for several reasons. First, he claims his attorney assured him that inaccurate information would not hurt
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193132 - 2017-09-21

State v. Steven W. Gauerke
accomplice identified him as a co-burglar. Gauerke also gave evasive answers to police questioning, see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12023 - 2005-03-31

Timothy C. Heckmann v.
permit him to reapply after two years, during which he may demonstrate that he has the necessary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17133 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
rights to be charged during a definitive charging period that would allow him to prepare a defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84916 - 2012-07-17

COURT OF APPEALS
for two and one-half weeks as of the date of the search and that she knew him approximately a year before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30231 - 2007-09-11

[PDF] State v. Bentura Martinez
-CR -2- On appeal, Martinez argues that: (1) the procedures used to identify him were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9312 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
as of the date of the search and that she knew him approximately a year before she moved in with him. She
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30231 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. David A. Prusinski
to induce him or her to respond to the questioning. See id. at 236, 401 N.W.2d at 766. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11586 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
been improperly induced by any promises (the court did confirm with Spates that no one threatened him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1061667 - 2026-01-14