Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12841 - 12850 of 60169 for quit claim deed/1000.

Scott Mullen v. Gerald VandeVoort
to determine the actual amount the parties agreed upon for the work. In addition, the Mullens claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5589 - 2005-03-31

State v. Brian J. Dorsey
postconviction motion seeking to withdraw his plea. He claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18503 - 2005-06-13

COURT OF APPEALS
to proceed with his tort claim of medical abandonment. Casperson argues he does not need expert testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28779 - 2007-04-23

COURT OF APPEALS
and misrepresentation claims against James W. Parker and an order denying its motion for reconsideration. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106567 - 2014-01-14

[PDF] State of Wisconsin ex rel., v. David H. Schwarz
claims: (1) that his attorney at his revocation hearing was No. 97-2939 2 ineffective; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13111 - 2017-09-21

2006 WI APP 260
personal injury claim had no value when the inventory was filed and thus the register in probate may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26674 - 2006-12-19

[PDF] Brown County Department of Human Services v. Terrance M.
is entitled to judicial substitution and the new judge should determine whether claim or issue preclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7644 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Armin Nankin v. Village of Shorewood
that WIS. STAT. § 74.37(6) (1997-98)1 be declared unconstitutional. Nankin claims the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15418 - 2017-09-21

Ashley E. Mews v. Derek J. Beaster
the pendency of a motion to dismiss part of a plaintiff’s claim absolves the plaintiff from having to act
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7481 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
an order dismissing its breach of contract claim against Richard Brandt. The court granted Brandt’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28120 - 2014-09-15