Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12851 - 12860 of 30126 for consulta de causas.

Margaret Lamkin v. St. Croix County
and dismissed her complaint. Our review of summary judgment is de novo. We apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10088 - 2005-03-31

State of Wisconsin ex rel., v. David H. Schwarz
the deficiency or the prejudice prong is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See State v. Pitsch
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13111 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] John P. Livesey, Sr. v. Aurora Health Care, Inc.
from a grant of summary judgment raises an issue of law which we review de novo by applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11967 - 2017-09-21

City of Chippewa Falls v. Town of Hallie
of statutory interpretation, a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Kirch, 222 Wis.2d 598, 602
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15316 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
, is reviewed de novo. See id. ¶11 A police officer may conduct a traffic stop when, under the totality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39337 - 2009-08-12

State v. Sandra L. Barrette
.2d 119, 132, 454 N.W.2d 780, 785 (1990). The standard of review is not de novo, but rather gives
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12918 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
review a circuit court’s ruling on summary judgment de novo, and we apply the governing standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96546 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Jermaine Jones
to raise a question of fact necessitating a Machner hearing. This review is de novo. No. 94-2763
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8191 - 2017-09-19

State v. Alil Azizi
is a neutral and detached magistrate raises a question of constitutional fact which we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8987 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
assistance of counsel is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id. DISCUSSION
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90571 - 2012-12-12