Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12851 - 12860 of 67478 for ct.

State v. Mark H. Price
(Ct. App. 1991). One is termed the “subjective test” and measures the judge's own perception of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10367 - 2005-03-31

State v. Bruce J. Kuechler
and Rule 809.62. Appeal No. 02-1205-CR Cir. Ct. No. 01-CF-43 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5225 - 2005-03-31

State v. Major C. Latimer
.” State v. Ray, 166 Wis. 2d 855, 861, 481 N.W.2d 288 (Ct. App. 1992) (quoting State v. Poellinger, 153 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15782 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 2007AP2916-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2005CF136 STATE OF WISCONSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34660 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 2013AP2481 Cir. Ct. No. 1996ME81D STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115428 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Michael Peot v. Paper Transport of Green Bay
. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 01-2441 Cir. Ct. No. 00 CV 3479 STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4372 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
N.W.2d 115 (Ct. App. 1996). A no-merit appeal in the court of appeals is an exception to the rule
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=830235 - 2024-07-23

State v. William J. Kubacki
“leniency, mistake, or compromise.” See State v. Thomas, 161 Wis.2d 616, 631, 468 N.W.2d 729, 735 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11702 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 2019AP668-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2008CF1778 STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264162 - 2020-06-11

[PDF] State v. Chad D. Everts
. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 02-1892-CR Cir. Ct. No. 00-CM-1599 STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5473 - 2017-09-19