Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12851 - 12860 of 58492 for speedy trial.

[PDF] State v. Thomas D. Myers
postconviction motion for a new trial.1 On appeal, Myers challenges the voluntariness of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10115 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
raises three claims on appeal: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion at sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34788 - 2008-12-08

[PDF] State v. Thomas A. Drexler
2 to WIS. STAT. § 346.63(1)(a) (2001-02). 2 Drexler argues that the trial court, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5262 - 2017-09-19

State v. Keith Schroeder
that the terminology might come up at trial. Second, there was no Fourth Amendment violation in the crime lab’s search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15926 - 2005-03-31

Jerry J. Garceau v. Brenda S. Garceau
to termination and the number of years the agent has been with the company at the time of termination. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14776 - 2005-03-31

Albert Carini v. The Medical Protective Company
Compensation Fund (collectively MPC). At the close of the evidence, the trial court determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12663 - 2005-03-31

State v. Thomas D. Myers
with a weapon, and from an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial.[1] On appeal, Myers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10115 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Dion C. Mitchell
He claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it denied his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6225 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Albert Carini v. The Medical Protective Company
(collectively MPC). At the close of the evidence, the trial court determined that the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12663 - 2017-09-21

State v. Lisa A. Carter
(1), Stats. She additionally appeals from the trial court order denying postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14142 - 2005-03-31