Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12861 - 12870 of 30013 for consulta de causas.
Search results 12861 - 12870 of 30013 for consulta de causas.
State v. Donnie Cobbs
a constitutional violation is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Street, 202 Wis.2d 533, 543
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12909 - 2005-03-31
a constitutional violation is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Street, 202 Wis.2d 533, 543
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12909 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo. Id., ¶11. ¶9 Here, the circuit court found that “the officer did articulate reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72624 - 2014-09-15
de novo. Id., ¶11. ¶9 Here, the circuit court found that “the officer did articulate reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72624 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Scot Cadeau v. Dairyland Insurance Company
is a question of law which we review de novo. Amber J.F. v. Richard B., 205 Wis.2d 510, 515, 557 N.W.2d 84
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13390 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law which we review de novo. Amber J.F. v. Richard B., 205 Wis.2d 510, 515, 557 N.W.2d 84
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13390 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
George D. French, Jr. v. Ronald R. Fiedler
of Vivid. Our review of summary judgments is de novo; we apply the same methodology as the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10809 - 2017-09-20
of Vivid. Our review of summary judgments is de novo; we apply the same methodology as the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10809 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Anthony Johnson
was justified under the “plain view” exception to the warrant requirement is subject to this court's de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9964 - 2017-09-19
was justified under the “plain view” exception to the warrant requirement is subject to this court's de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9964 - 2017-09-19
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
]he ultimate determination of whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial” de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15524 - 2005-03-31
]he ultimate determination of whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial” de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15524 - 2005-03-31
State v. Leonard Bendlin
of the trial court’s determination that Bendlin was “in custody” is de novo. See State v. Clappes, 136 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13630 - 2005-03-31
of the trial court’s determination that Bendlin was “in custody” is de novo. See State v. Clappes, 136 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13630 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Gilmore appeals. ¶7 We review summary judgments de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103484 - 2013-10-28
. Gilmore appeals. ¶7 We review summary judgments de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103484 - 2013-10-28
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Debra J.A.
). Whether the trial court complied with § 48.315 in this case is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2189 - 2005-03-31
). Whether the trial court complied with § 48.315 in this case is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2189 - 2005-03-31
Charles R. Koehn v.
and the matter was tried de novo in circuit court. At that trial, Attorney Koehn testified that he had not billed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17058 - 2005-03-31
and the matter was tried de novo in circuit court. At that trial, Attorney Koehn testified that he had not billed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17058 - 2005-03-31