Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12861 - 12870 of 24459 for extending.
Search results 12861 - 12870 of 24459 for extending.
CA Blank Order
extended for good cause and without objection. See § 48.315(1)(b), (2), (3). No issue of arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101009 - 2013-08-20
extended for good cause and without objection. See § 48.315(1)(b), (2), (3). No issue of arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101009 - 2013-08-20
[PDF]
State v. Paul L. Wolfe
, extended supervision or parole hold under s. 304.06(3) or 973.10(2) placed upon the person for the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2648 - 2017-09-19
, extended supervision or parole hold under s. 304.06(3) or 973.10(2) placed upon the person for the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2648 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
obligation to a pro se appellant “does not extend to … making an argument for the litigant.” Smith, 220
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209004 - 2018-02-26
obligation to a pro se appellant “does not extend to … making an argument for the litigant.” Smith, 220
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209004 - 2018-02-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
confinement and two years’ extended supervision with jail credit of 216 days, and made Gregory eligible
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160008 - 2017-09-21
confinement and two years’ extended supervision with jail credit of 216 days, and made Gregory eligible
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160008 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 31, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
of initial confinement and three years of extended supervision for the possession of an improvised explosive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26957 - 2006-10-30
of initial confinement and three years of extended supervision for the possession of an improvised explosive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26957 - 2006-10-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of initial confinement and 20 years of extended supervision. This appeal follows. DISCUSSION ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=961908 - 2025-05-28
of initial confinement and 20 years of extended supervision. This appeal follows. DISCUSSION ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=961908 - 2025-05-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of initial confinement followed by two years and six months of extended supervision on the strangulation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=744749 - 2023-12-28
of initial confinement followed by two years and six months of extended supervision on the strangulation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=744749 - 2023-12-28
Donald Hue v. Mary Ann Terpstra (Formerly Bowman)
against him does not extend to Bowman. Though Hue was both legal counsel and a director of Bowman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7693 - 2005-03-31
against him does not extend to Bowman. Though Hue was both legal counsel and a director of Bowman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7693 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
with WIS. STAT. § 973.01 relating to the imposition of a bifurcated sentence of confinement and extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96370 - 2014-09-15
with WIS. STAT. § 973.01 relating to the imposition of a bifurcated sentence of confinement and extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96370 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and eighteen months of extended supervision. It then stayed the sentence in favor of three years
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213191 - 2018-05-18
and eighteen months of extended supervision. It then stayed the sentence in favor of three years
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213191 - 2018-05-18