Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12871 - 12880 of 46087 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 12871 - 12880 of 46087 for paternity test paper work.
State v. John M. Kieffer
and rolling papers on or near the coffee table in front of the couch. ¶10 There was a door from the living
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17077 - 2005-03-31
and rolling papers on or near the coffee table in front of the couch. ¶10 There was a door from the living
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17077 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. John M. Kieffer
and rolling papers on or near the coffee table in front of the couch. ¶10 There was a door from the living
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17077 - 2017-09-21
and rolling papers on or near the coffee table in front of the couch. ¶10 There was a door from the living
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17077 - 2017-09-21
State v. Joseph V. Hotynski
field sobriety tests as consciousness of guilt when the failure to take the tests resulted from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9827 - 2005-03-31
field sobriety tests as consciousness of guilt when the failure to take the tests resulted from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9827 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
suppressed the results of his breath test because the Informing the Accused form read to him pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31509 - 2008-01-14
suppressed the results of his breath test because the Informing the Accused form read to him pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31509 - 2008-01-14
State v. Michael G. Costigan
of a breathalyzer test, should have been suppressed by the trial court. We affirm the judgment of conviction. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8904 - 2005-03-31
of a breathalyzer test, should have been suppressed by the trial court. We affirm the judgment of conviction. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8904 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
County of Rusk v. Keith R. Aussem
and that probable cause existed to administer the preliminary breath test. He also argues the court should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5736 - 2017-09-19
and that probable cause existed to administer the preliminary breath test. He also argues the court should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5736 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
the results of his breath test because the Informing the Accused form read to him pursuant to Wisconsin’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31509 - 2014-09-15
the results of his breath test because the Informing the Accused form read to him pursuant to Wisconsin’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31509 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Michael G. Costigan
statements, observations of the officer, and the results of a breathalyzer test, should have been suppressed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8904 - 2017-09-19
statements, observations of the officer, and the results of a breathalyzer test, should have been suppressed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8904 - 2017-09-19
County of Rusk v. Keith R. Aussem
to administer the preliminary breath test. He also argues the court should be reversed because it applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5736 - 2005-03-31
to administer the preliminary breath test. He also argues the court should be reversed because it applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5736 - 2005-03-31
Ozaukee County v. Perry P. Lieuallen
Ozaukee county to Waukesha county. Second, he asserts that, in addition to the breath test results
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15346 - 2005-03-31
Ozaukee county to Waukesha county. Second, he asserts that, in addition to the breath test results
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15346 - 2005-03-31