Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12871 - 12880 of 58277 for speedy trial.
Search results 12871 - 12880 of 58277 for speedy trial.
State v. Edward J. Brantley
for the child’s welfare and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Brantley contends the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5776 - 2005-03-31
for the child’s welfare and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Brantley contends the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5776 - 2005-03-31
Jerry J. Garceau v. Brenda S. Garceau
to termination and the number of years the agent has been with the company at the time of termination. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14776 - 2005-03-31
to termination and the number of years the agent has been with the company at the time of termination. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14776 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Sam Elam
following a jury trial. Elam argues that: (1) there was insufficient evidence to support the conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14854 - 2017-09-21
following a jury trial. Elam argues that: (1) there was insufficient evidence to support the conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14854 - 2017-09-21
State v. Dennis L. Richardson
in an unreported summary disposition because, in our view, the trial court had improperly excluded evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3673 - 2005-03-31
in an unreported summary disposition because, in our view, the trial court had improperly excluded evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3673 - 2005-03-31
State v. Thomas D. Myers
with a weapon, and from an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial.[1] On appeal, Myers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10115 - 2005-03-31
with a weapon, and from an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial.[1] On appeal, Myers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10115 - 2005-03-31
Michael D. Lawrence v. American Family Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
medical experts. He also contends that he was “unduly prejudiced” and is entitled to a new trial because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12643 - 2005-03-31
medical experts. He also contends that he was “unduly prejudiced” and is entitled to a new trial because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12643 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Dennis L. Richardson
reversed in an unreported summary disposition because, in our view, the trial court had improperly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3673 - 2017-09-19
reversed in an unreported summary disposition because, in our view, the trial court had improperly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3673 - 2017-09-19
State v. Oto Orlik
. Oto Orlik appeals a trial court order that prohibited him from having contact with his wife
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14570 - 2005-03-31
. Oto Orlik appeals a trial court order that prohibited him from having contact with his wife
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14570 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Albert Carini v. The Medical Protective Company
(collectively MPC). At the close of the evidence, the trial court determined that the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12663 - 2017-09-21
(collectively MPC). At the close of the evidence, the trial court determined that the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12663 - 2017-09-21
State v. Keith Schroeder
that the terminology might come up at trial. Second, there was no Fourth Amendment violation in the crime lab’s search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15529 - 2005-03-31
that the terminology might come up at trial. Second, there was no Fourth Amendment violation in the crime lab’s search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15529 - 2005-03-31