Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12871 - 12880 of 58381 for speedy trial.
Search results 12871 - 12880 of 58381 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Oto Orlik
and Deininger, JJ. VERGERONT, J. Oto Orlik appeals a trial court order that prohibited him from having
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14570 - 2017-09-21
and Deininger, JJ. VERGERONT, J. Oto Orlik appeals a trial court order that prohibited him from having
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14570 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
raises three claims on appeal: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion at sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34788 - 2008-12-08
raises three claims on appeal: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion at sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34788 - 2008-12-08
Albert Carini v. The Medical Protective Company
Compensation Fund (collectively MPC). At the close of the evidence, the trial court determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12663 - 2005-03-31
Compensation Fund (collectively MPC). At the close of the evidence, the trial court determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12663 - 2005-03-31
State v. Sam Elam
)(a) and 939.05 (1997‑98),[1] entered following a jury trial. Elam argues that: (1) there was insufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14854 - 2005-03-31
)(a) and 939.05 (1997‑98),[1] entered following a jury trial. Elam argues that: (1) there was insufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14854 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Sam Elam
following a jury trial. Elam argues that: (1) there was insufficient evidence to support the conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14854 - 2017-09-21
following a jury trial. Elam argues that: (1) there was insufficient evidence to support the conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14854 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
contends that the trial court erred in relying on WIS. STAT. § 42.424(4) when it refused her request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66203 - 2014-09-15
contends that the trial court erred in relying on WIS. STAT. § 42.424(4) when it refused her request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66203 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Michael D. Lawrence v. American Family Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
also contends that he was “unduly prejudiced” and is entitled to a new trial because the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12643 - 2017-09-21
also contends that he was “unduly prejudiced” and is entitled to a new trial because the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12643 - 2017-09-21
State v. Keith Schroeder
that the terminology might come up at trial. Second, there was no Fourth Amendment violation in the crime lab’s search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15926 - 2005-03-31
that the terminology might come up at trial. Second, there was no Fourth Amendment violation in the crime lab’s search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15926 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Russell K. Whitford v. Karen L. Whitford
the trial court’s order that requires him to pay $750 per month maintenance to his former wife, Karen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15199 - 2017-09-21
the trial court’s order that requires him to pay $750 per month maintenance to his former wife, Karen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15199 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s previous denial of his motion to dismiss; and (2) his trial attorney was constitutionally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=753473 - 2024-01-23
court’s previous denial of his motion to dismiss; and (2) his trial attorney was constitutionally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=753473 - 2024-01-23