Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12881 - 12890 of 47836 for "roommate" "sacrifice" "season 3 finale" TV show.

State v. Thomas J. McPhetridge
, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996). To prove deficient performance, a defendant must show specific acts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4890 - 2005-03-31

Dale Marek v. David H. Schwarz
judge’s written decision shows that he considered the Plotkin factors: [Marek] has shown he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24978 - 2006-05-01

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of the evidence requires a showing that “the evidence, viewed most favorably to the state and the conviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=333718 - 2021-02-10

COURT OF APPEALS
for summary judgment, a moving defendant must show a defense that would defeat the plaintiff. If the moving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76251 - 2012-01-09

COURT OF APPEALS
and convincing evidence that he abandoned Bane. Michael believed Nicole would be able to show that, although he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88160 - 2012-10-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, a petitioner must show that counsel’s performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177795 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that Burgeson consented to the blood draw which showed tetrahydrocannabinols in his blood. At the plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145090 - 2017-09-21

William J. Adney v. USAA Property & Casualty Insurance
requires a showing that the attorney violated a duty of care. Cook v. Continental Cas. Co., 180 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4264 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] A.B. Data, Ltd. v. Graphic Workshop, Inc.
with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16153 - 2017-09-21

State v. Rodney Henderson Reed
, 191 (Ct. App. 1984). An appellant can only overcome this presumption by showing an “unreasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8174 - 2005-03-31