Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12881 - 12890 of 19106 for citi.
Search results 12881 - 12890 of 19106 for citi.
[PDF]
Dairyland Greyhound Park, Inc. v. James E. Doyle
Langley, Patrick McDonnell, and William J. Domina, Milwaukee, on behalf of the City of Milwaukee
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25930 - 2017-09-21
Langley, Patrick McDonnell, and William J. Domina, Milwaukee, on behalf of the City of Milwaukee
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25930 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
Accepted CA Dist/ Cty CA Decision 2013AP1715 The Journal Times v. City of Racine Board
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145285 - 2017-09-21
Accepted CA Dist/ Cty CA Decision 2013AP1715 The Journal Times v. City of Racine Board
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145285 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
2023AP001399 - Response of Petitioners, Democratic Senator Respondents, Governor Evers, and Wright Intervenors to Motion to Subpoena Consultants or Strike Report
) .................................................................................. 17 City of Sun Prairie v. Davis, 226 Wis. 2d 738, 595 N.W.2d 635 (1999
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_0213petitionersresponse.pdf - 2024-02-13
) .................................................................................. 17 City of Sun Prairie v. Davis, 226 Wis. 2d 738, 595 N.W.2d 635 (1999
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_0213petitionersresponse.pdf - 2024-02-13
[PDF]
Brief of Amicus Curiae (William Whitford, et al.)
) ............................................ 13 Guy v. Miller, No. 11-OC-00042-IB (Nev. Dist. Ct., Carson City Oct. 27, 2011) .......... 12
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/briefamicuscuriaewhitford.pdf - 2021-10-25
) ............................................ 13 Guy v. Miller, No. 11-OC-00042-IB (Nev. Dist. Ct., Carson City Oct. 27, 2011) .......... 12
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/briefamicuscuriaewhitford.pdf - 2021-10-25
Wisconsin Citizens Concerned for Cranes and Doves v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
interpretation, our chief objective is to discern the intent of the legislature. See Anderson v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5214 - 2005-03-31
interpretation, our chief objective is to discern the intent of the legislature. See Anderson v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5214 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. CITY OF NEW BERLIN, ABC INSURANCE COMPANY AND NEW BERLIN PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197182 - 2017-10-04
. CITY OF NEW BERLIN, ABC INSURANCE COMPANY AND NEW BERLIN PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197182 - 2017-10-04
[PDF]
WI APP 21
.’” City of Appleton v. Town of Menasha, 142 Wis. 2d 870, 879-80, 419 N.W.2d 249 (1988) (quoted source
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135322 - 2017-09-21
.’” City of Appleton v. Town of Menasha, 142 Wis. 2d 870, 879-80, 419 N.W.2d 249 (1988) (quoted source
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135322 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
the interpretation is unreasonable. DOR v. River City Refuse Removal, Inc., 2007 WI 27, ¶33, 299 Wis. 2d 561, 729 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107543 - 2014-01-29
the interpretation is unreasonable. DOR v. River City Refuse Removal, Inc., 2007 WI 27, ¶33, 299 Wis. 2d 561, 729 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107543 - 2014-01-29
2011 WI APP 63
of the City of Racine Police Department that deals with a lot of gang members, and everyone has got a street
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63073 - 2011-05-25
of the City of Racine Police Department that deals with a lot of gang members, and everyone has got a street
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63073 - 2011-05-25
[PDF]
WI App 60
. If the district attorney chose not to prosecute, the case would be referred to the municipal city attorney, who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1009852 - 2025-11-20
. If the district attorney chose not to prosecute, the case would be referred to the municipal city attorney, who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1009852 - 2025-11-20