Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12881 - 12890 of 16438 for commenting.

State v. David A.L.
was present in the hallway when these comments were made. The bailiff reported the incident to the judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10242 - 2005-03-31

Frontsheet
. Attorney Boyd inserted some reference to the fire in the bankruptcy schedules, including the comment
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33468 - 2008-07-17

Kenneth Urman v. Brian Barron
158 (Ct. App. 1990). ¶27 Next, Barron argues that although the court “did not comment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4176 - 2005-03-31

Michael A. Yamat v. Verma L. B.
guardian. The trial court also comments that, at that time of the nomination, “Mr. Yamat was in the office
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11258 - 2005-03-31

State v. Keith Schroeder
comments about her hobbies. The woman contacted the Internet access provider and requested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15926 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
.’s interview in which C.D. was commenting on A.B.’s truthfulness or credibility. Admitting those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=601012 - 2022-12-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
comments regarding Spivey’s testimony, when taken in context, did not constitute improper vouching
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255476 - 2020-03-03

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that he “didn’t believe in needles” and “didn’t want AIDs.” We stated that “[t]hese isolated comments do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82884 - 2014-09-15

State v. Antwan D. Robinson
mind, it is clear that these comments are consistent with our conclusion.
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21138 - 2006-01-30

State v. Virgil L. Burks
in refusing almost all requests for waiver of trial by jury,” and pointed to the trial judge’s comment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6183 - 2005-03-31