Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12881 - 12890 of 30013 for consulta de causas.
Search results 12881 - 12890 of 30013 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the “result” of the PBT is correct as a matter of statutory interpretation—a question of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184274 - 2017-09-21
of the “result” of the PBT is correct as a matter of statutory interpretation—a question of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184274 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Heidi Lyn Cvicker v. Stephen Donald Cvicker
a de novo hearing before the circuit court. See § 767.13(6), STATS. After the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13581 - 2017-09-21
a de novo hearing before the circuit court. See § 767.13(6), STATS. After the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13581 - 2017-09-21
Fred C. Hageny, Jr. v. Edwin A. Schowalter
is a question of law that we review de novo. See Delap v. Institute of America, Inc., 31 Wis.2d 507, 510, 143
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10543 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law that we review de novo. See Delap v. Institute of America, Inc., 31 Wis.2d 507, 510, 143
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10543 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jacques Gibson
performance prejudiced the defendant are questions of law, which we review de novo. See Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14451 - 2005-03-31
performance prejudiced the defendant are questions of law, which we review de novo. See Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14451 - 2005-03-31
State v. Andres Godina
a defendant has met his or her burden of proof is also a question of law which is reviewed de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13092 - 2005-03-31
a defendant has met his or her burden of proof is also a question of law which is reviewed de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13092 - 2005-03-31
County of Marquette v. Martin E. Jacobs
reasonable suspicion to stop or probable cause to arrest are questions of law which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15308 - 2005-03-31
reasonable suspicion to stop or probable cause to arrest are questions of law which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15308 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael G. Costigan
facts satisfy the constitutional requirements presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8904 - 2005-03-31
facts satisfy the constitutional requirements presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8904 - 2005-03-31
Terry Locke v. Town of Menasha
review de novo. See id. Construction of legislation should conform to the intention of the body
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10733 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. See id. Construction of legislation should conform to the intention of the body
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10733 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert E. Irish
] The construction of a statute is a question of law that we review de novo. In re J.W.T., 159 Wis.2d 754, 760-61
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11250 - 2005-03-31
] The construction of a statute is a question of law that we review de novo. In re J.W.T., 159 Wis.2d 754, 760-61
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11250 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Nelson’s testimony in the trial de novo had limited Nelson’s claim to the amount called for under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30543 - 2007-10-09
Nelson’s testimony in the trial de novo had limited Nelson’s claim to the amount called for under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30543 - 2007-10-09