Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12881 - 12890 of 68211 for law.

State v. Nathaniel S. Sherrod
an act in an official capacity, (3) the officer was doing an act with lawful authority, and (4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12731 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
were not identical in law or fact and thus, were not multiplicitous. Johnson appeals. Johnson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192159 - 2017-09-21

Alexander L. Jacobus v. State
interpretation presents a question of law which we review de novo. State ex rel. Frederick v. McCaughtry, 173
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8266 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Jerald J. Hupe
traffic law. However, almost immediately after observing No. 96-0356-CR -2- the Lincoln
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10348 - 2017-09-20

Supreme Court of Wisconsin
which it leases as office space to a law firm whose attorneys are likely to come before the judge’s
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30493 - 2007-09-30

[PDF] Village of Linden v. Todd N. Nagel
., involves the application of a statute to a particular set of facts. As such, it is a question of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15594 - 2017-09-21

Village of Linden v. Todd N. Nagel
of a statute to a particular set of facts. As such, it is a question of law which we decide without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15593 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] John Cianciolo v. Antonina Cianciolo
identified Serafina Cianciolo as a Wisconsin domiciliary, incorporated Wisconsin law for purposes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11133 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
to those facts is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. Here, the facts are undisputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36263 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] David Schmidt v. Wisconsin O'Connor Corporation
determined that in small claims actions the law contemplates a trial de novo from a disputed court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4385 - 2017-09-19